“Any companies involved in IT should stick their snout in the trough now, because it’s going to be a gravy train,” said Professor Ian Angell, head of the LSE’s department of information systems. “Some companies are worried about the effect on their brand when the scheme fails, as it will. Don’t worry — just blame the government.”
“This is a huge opportunity for IT companies, as there are no downsides. Bid for everything — the system will be so huge, there won’t be enough manpower in the country to deliver. And you can put in ridiculous prices, because the system won’t work. It’s a Mad Hatter’s tea party,” added Angell.
Recent Posts
- Last few hours of the kickstarter. Time to Pledge.
- Opinionated Infrastructure: On Nuts, Packaging, Convenience, and Infrastructure As A Service
- Opinionated Infrastructure: ‘Pon the Floor, Impact, MobileFirst and Zend
- Why Shoreditch needs a Village Hall and how you can help build it for the local and tech communities
- Mobile, Informed Consent, and the Permission First Web
Recent Comments
- jgovernor on Why Shoreditch needs a Village Hall and how you can help build it for the local and tech communities
- David Altheer on Why Shoreditch needs a Village Hall and how you can help build it for the local and tech communities
- Anton on Why Shoreditch needs a Village Hall and how you can help build it for the local and tech communities
- Luis on Mobile, Informed Consent, and the Permission First Web
- Donnie Berkholz on Mobile, Informed Consent, and the Permission First Web
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- October 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
Categories
- agile
- analystbusiness
- APIs
- AR
- Bit Miles
- charity
- cloud
- Cloud Computing
- CSR
- data
- Dell
- developer relations
- developerintelligence
- developers
- EMC
- HP
- HTML
- IBM
- industry ecosystems
- Java
- language
- linux, cloud, saas, IBM, mainframe
- LiveCycle
- mainframe
- messaging
- Microsoft
- mobile development
- opensource
- programming languages
- salesforce.com
- SAP
- Shoreditch
- Social Business
- socialmedia
- sustainability
- testing
- transparency
- Uncategorized
- UX

There’s a critical issue here. ZERO accountability in the public domain. The ‘commercial confidentiality’ argument is a flag of convenience behind which government hides. Isn’t it now a case that having outsourced so much of its IT expertise there simply isn’t the intellectual bandwidth to argue against the vendor community. That makes for a free for all. It seems it is only when there’s enough noise that the EDSs of this world (for example) are brought to account.
Personally, I thought it was hilarious that government should put its trust in a company bearing the same name as the organisation that was fined $456 million by the SEC for flogging illegal tax schemes.
Credibililty? What credibility?
hey james.
good point. you should point this to the crew over at http://www.identity20.com/ and my fellow vancouver-ites http://www.sxip.com.
Cheers.
funny you should say that andre. i am in the process of getting with dick hardt, at duane nickull’s introduction. so the spirit of vancouver is with us, ay?