Blogs

RedMonk

Skip to content

The Role of Automation in Cloud Computing – a RedMonk/CA Webinar

I’m always interested in how IT Management changes to take advantage of new technologies, now-a-days, that means sorting out what do with cloud computing. I recorded a short webinar on the topic along with CA Technologies’ Brandon Whichard (the co-host of the Austin Tech Scene podcast, you may recall) – check out the recording here.

In my part of the talk, I quickly outline a working definition of cloud, and then go over possible benefits and how IT management, specifically automation technologies and practices, should change to take full advantage of those benefits. Brandon ends the webinar with a description of how CA Technologies’ automation portfolio fits in. The quick video above gives a 1 minute pitch for the webinar. Here’s the official abstract:

Data Center Automation has become exciting again, especially in the cloud: find out why in this webinar. In recent years innovations like virtualization and cloud computing have created new practices and technologies that optimize how IT delivers business services. Automation in particular is seeing useful, dramatic innovations that draw on these new technologies. Successfully leveraging the cloud requires mastery of both virtualization and automation. Hear directly from industry analyst and domain experts on topics include:

  • What is driving the need for more automation
  • Why automation is important to cloud computing
  • How to leverage both public and private clouds
  • Dynamic Datacenter made possible

If you’re interested, just fill out the registration form and you’ll be given a link to the recording.

There’s also a document version of the presentation I wrote up available if you’d prefer that, though it doesn’t have Brandon’s part of the talk. Brandon also wrote-up this webinar, There’s also a bit of an omnibus automation suite from CA Technologies today if you want to dig in even deeper.

Disclosure: CA Technologies is a client and sponsored this webinar.

Categories: Cloud, Systems Management.

Tags:

Open source IT Management, virtualization, and cloud use – Zenoss Survey

RedMonk client Zenoss recently did a couple surveys over its user base asking about open source, virtualization, and cloud computing use. Zenoss’ Mark Hinkle and I go over the results of that survey in this brief video, with plenty of the charts and graphs to follow.

The results were interesting, and in my experience have been matching up with both anecdotal data and other surveys I’ve been looking at. The adoption of open source in IT Management seems to have gone more mainstream than not; virtualization seems to be VMWare, Hyper-V, and then Xen or KVM; and while lower costs drive rabid interest in using cloud, most prospective users are still concerned about security and other fundamentals.

In addition to the video, for more info check out Zenoss’ report on the virtualization and cloud aspects of the survey as well as their info-graphic and summary of the open source usage survey.

Transcript

Michael Coté: Well, hello everybody! Here we are in the lovely RedMonk Austin office. I am Michael Coté, as always, available at peopleoverprocess.com, and I am joined by a guest here.

Mark Hinkle: I am Mark Hinkle from Zenoss, where I am the VP of Community.

Michael Coté: What we are going to talk about today is, you guys recently put out a survey among your user base, basically about a — it was kind of a mixture of what you think of Open Source, to paraphrase it, and then also kind of some usage metrics about virtualization and cloud use and things like that.

So if I remember right, basically you had multiple surveys that you guys conducted at various places and times and kind of combined them together.

Mark Hinkle: The first survey we did was among the attendees at USENIX LISA, and LISA stands for Large Installation System Administrator Conference. We also did a survey of the same questions among the Zenoss Open Source user base.

So at LISA, the demographic are usually server administrators for organizations with large numbers of virtual or physical servers, so 500 or more. And then among our user base, we have a broad variety of people who do networking, server application virtualization, and gave us a more rounded view of IT management. Then we asked them about their Open Source usage and their general systems manage usage.

Michael Coté: And were they all Zenoss users or customers?

Mark Hinkle: All users of Zenoss.

Michael Coté: Okay. You guys actually pulled together a presentation that highlights some of the more interesting findings. So I wanted to kind of go over some of those things, and the first one, basically that a lot of people pay attention to is, I guess you could call it the mainstreamization of using Open Source.

Mark Hinkle: I think that overall the shift was, everybody knows that they are using Open Source and they are fine with it. I think there was a large percentage of the early adopters that say no big deal, but I think there’s also a shift now of that, if you go with Geoffrey Moore’s Technology Adoption Curve, I think more of the mainstream now is adopting Open Source and they are adopting it for business reasons and not for political or personal.

Michael Coté: Not for the rainbow and sandal reason.

Mark Hinkle: Exactly! I think that’s a big shift, is it’s legitimate now, and Linux on the server, Apache on the web server, there’s a ton of MySQL database, and then there’s a ton of serious enterprise grade tools out there that people are using to run their businesses, in conjunction with proprietary software.

So I think that in the past we were sort of Open Source apologists, like it’s good enough, take a shot, and now I think people just say, it’s the way we run our business.

Michael Coté: Right. So you are saying like that flexibility is like the trumping thing, and like what does that mean exactly?

Mark Hinkle: Yeah. I think that means that you are not — if you buy something that has distinct licensing terms; you have so many seats, you have seat licenses, you can deploy it on so many locations, all these things are one aspect of it.

I think the other thing is just the openness of the software; they typically have open APIs, the data is not obfuscated. So for example, in Zenoss, if you don’t like the way that we report, the data is there in a MySQL database and you could use a BI tool to pull reports.

I think the integrations, points, customization, we see a lot of people who are using configuration management tools in conjunction with monitoring tools and creating these Open Source tool chains, which are the output of your monitoring tool and forms your configuration tool and vice versa, and then you can now automate from that too.

I mean, taking tools, and I am speaking from a management standpoint, but pretty much any kind of set of Open Source products put together, you can start doing more tightly integrated infrastructure than you can a lot of times with proprietary, close source limited API tools.

After flexibility, lower cost was by far the biggest answer, but then easy to deploy, which I thought was ironic, because in the early days of — like even Linux, you do —

Michael Coté: Oh, like Slackware days?

Mark Hinkle: Yeah, yeah. You didn’t have that it’s a seamless install experience like you did on Solaris and Sun hardware. I mean, that was not the same — the low barrier to get deployed wasn’t there and now I think it is.

We also have quality, as ironically for a distributed — and a lot of these things are distributedly developed, their quality was very high in the list of why people wanted to use it.

And then the lowest reason, and we only asked five questions, was source code, which is one of the things in the early days of Open Source people touted as, oh, I need the source code. I think that was a security blanket. I think very few people actually hacked on the code.

Michael Coté: Well, also in this bundled survey, if you will, that you guys did, you talked about usage things, technologies people were using and how they were managing their infrastructure. So the first area that you guys went over was virtualization, which is sort of — I mean, it’s funny, like everyone is kind of cloud crazy nowadays, but really virtualization is sort of like the part of the iceberg underneath the water. It seems to be huge out there.

So like what — the big thing people are curious about nowadays, or one of the big things is, what the hypervisor spread is; like what virtualization platforms people are using, and what did you guys see in your survey?

Mark Hinkle: We saw that VMware, far and above, was the most widely deployed virtualization technology in almost 80% of the enterprises that we surveyed. That’s what we would expect. They have high penetration, Fortune 5000. They are enterprise grade virtualization and they have management tools that are good around that.

The surprising thing was that even though VMware had far and away the largest market penetration, there was still 20% of our users or more that were using KVM, Xen, and then VirtualBox, which is the virtualization technology from Oracle.

Michael Coté: So in addition to finding just sort of the usage numbers, the different hypervisors, did you guys ask questions about how people were using virtualization, how it kind of fit into their process?

Mark Hinkle: We asked them about their preferences on using virtualization. So did they prefer to use it versus deploying natively on hardware, and about 40% said yes, we prefer to install in a virtual instance. And then about 29% said that they wanted — they did whenever possible. So some applications that they felt like needed the native installs, they did it that way.

But overall, only 5.3% said they don’t use it at all, and 12.7% said they use it sparingly. So overall people’s preference in the 60% range is to deploy virtually.

Michael Coté: Right. So it’s at least peaked over the majority, if you will, of sort of like the way we deploy new things.

Mark Hinkle: Yeah, yeah.

Michael Coté: Also like with Open Source, you guys were asking like why are you using virtualization, and I think there’s some kind of obvious answers like consolidation and things like that, but what did you guys find when you were asking people why they were going through the trouble of virtualizing things?

Mark Hinkle: Once again, they said flexibility, followed by cost savings. The interesting thing, labor cost savings was very low, less than 10%, as was administration ease of use. So it wasn’t easy to use, because there’s a lot more — just by the very nature of virtualization and splitting up machines, you have a lot more servers it seems, it’s just the flexibility and how you deploy them still seems to trump ease of use.

Michael Coté: Yeah. I mean, basically it’s so much quicker and easier to bring things up and bring them down and deploy them and control everything, and that’s the kind of flexibility people are going for here.

The last topic that you guys talked about, and like we were saying, kind of once you get used to virtualizing things, it kind of lays that foundation of doing cloud computing essentially. So getting into the cloud stuff, like what were the kind of questions you guys asked in that area?

Mark Hinkle: We asked what types of data or what types of uses they were going to have for the cloud application data, virtual computing, and which providers they were using, and what their plans were for 2010 as far as adopting file computing.

Well, the number one thing that they were going to do with cloud computing among our user base was deploy Linux servers on the cloud.

The second thing was hosted applications, and I think that’s probably — I think that cloud computing has expanded to the whole hosting and this —

Michael Coté: Into SaaS.

Mark Hinkle: Yeah, SaaS. So people that were doing CRM Messaging like hosted Outlook, things like that or something.

Then number three was hosted windows, and then hosted virtual servers that were other flavors, so Sun, things like that, were much lower. And then hosted data; 25% of the users were going to do hosted data.

Michael Coté: So taking those desires like what was the ranking of the hosters or the cloud providers people were looking at?

Mark Hinkle: So the most popular hosting, cloud hosting provider, and it was phrased in the way that we implied servers, so people that are doing computing in the cloud, it was Amazon, which had 43.9% of the market.

Michael Coté: Right, sort of the VMware of the cloud.

Mark Hinkle: Yeah, and really they are the market leader. And you would expect that just by the fact that they are the low cost entry. So they are going to have the most users.

The thing that I found surprising with number 2 was Google App Engine, which is really sort of this app-specific compute environment.

Michael Coté: Yeah, you wouldn’t expect like operators, the sysadmin types who you are asking to — because that’s more of a developer cloud.

Mark Hinkle: That was a surprise. And then Microsoft Azure was — I was surprised that Microsoft Azure, given that Windows hosting was farther down on the other list of the plans than Microsoft Azure, their cloud hosting platform was number 3, with 22% of the people —

Michael Coté: And it’s a similar sort of thing, where it’s an application platform, they don’t really have compute, if you will. So that’s interesting.

I mean, being like a management company, I mean you guys must have been interested in how people are managing cloud stuff, and like what was the extent of management people were doing, like how were they automating things and setting things and things like that?

Mark Hinkle: And that’s actually the surprise to me at least is that, you now have the power to spin up hundreds or thousands of servers almost instantaneously, but they weren’t automating. So they weren’t automating the starting and stopping based on — it’s only 28% or so, we are automating the starting and stopping of virtual instances based on demand and other management tasks.

Michael Coté: So they are still doing a lot of manual work?

Mark Hinkle: Yeah, yeah. So I think that’s the real promise is, cloud has some of these advantages from capital expenditure. They have better flexibility in how you deploy it. But for them, the next evolution I would say is to really see automated management of virtual systems based on enterprise conditions.

Michael Coté: Well, great! Well, I appreciate you taking all this time to kind of share the bundle of surveys that you had with us. It’s always good to have data.

Mark Hinkle: Yeah, thanks. Thanks for having me.

Disclosure: Zenoss is a client and sponsored this video. VMWare and Microsoft are clients as well.

Categories: Cloud, Open Source, Systems Management.

Tags:

Links for October 14th through October 15th

Disclosure: see the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned.

Categories: Links.

Tech Fundings, Startups, & Events – Austin Tech Scene #10

There’s been several tech companies funded in Austin recently, and we have some new startups and Austin tech things to talk about. After a month – or two? – off, Brandon and I have got plenty Austin tech news and topics jammed in!

Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here:

Show Notes

(Apologies for the most boring title ever for this episode.)

Disclosure: RedHat is a client, as is CA Technologies where Brandon works. I believe we mention MindQuilt, which is also a RedMonk client. See the RedMonk client list for others.

Categories: Austin Tech Scene.

Links for October 12th through October 13th

Charles' new Apple LED Cinema Display

A little something extra…

Speaking of gear, my friend Charles got a new LCD Apple Cinema Display yesterday (see above, and this series of photos). It’s a fantastic piece of equipment, and for a $1,000, expensive but not as outrageous as I’d assume an Apple monitor would be.

Aside from the monitor itself, the wiring that comes with it is well thought out: it has a laptop charger built in (so you can plug your laptop in via the monitor) and provides a 4 port USB hub (you plug a USB cord into your computer, the ports on the monitor become a hub). I mean, come on, that’s just really smart.

Being a whacky-programmer, Charles says it’s good for pair programming, which is actually an excellent point. And, you know, it’s just beautiful to look at.

Next time I have a spare $1,000 banging around <rolls eyes>, I need to get one. I imagine video editing on it is awesome, and reading Twitter stupendous ;>

The Links

Disclosure: see the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned.

Categories: Links.

Interesting Startups in Austin

Programmer's totems

Like the boys over at TechCrunch, I’ve gotten to like Quora for information mining. There’s a certain content serendipity as well, and it elicits content people who would otherwise not write to publish text (an effect Twitter has as well). Here’s a long answer I wrote to a question asking for interesting startups in Austin, just slightly edited to fit the form here.

There are many “interesting” startups in Austin, where interesting is “less concerned about “success” and more concerned about who is doing interesting stuff,” as Josh Williams put it. Here are a few that come to mind immediately:

  • Spiceworks – though getting a bit on in the tooth to be in the “startups you’ve never heard about,” is one of the most innovative companies in the IT Management area. They do several “interesting” things, here are some: add social networking into an otherwise very unsocial and boring area, IT Management, and then use the aggregate of their 100,000’s of active users to start doing analysis in aggregate, and figuring out how to build an advertising and marketing channel for IT admins. Not to mention the feature set and speed at which they deliver. Compared to other (most other) vendors in the IT Management market, it’s astonishing.
  • InfoChimps – they’re trying to create markets for data, something very interesting. Democratizing (making cheaper and easy to use) access to data should have “interesting” effects on applications and services companies can offer. Think of the data power Facebook has with all that detailed, every updating demographic data, and start to image what others could do with similar data sets. Most will just use it for Better Junk Mail, but even that is a good market. See my fellow RedMonker Stephen O’Grady’s take as well.
  • Riptano – they’re the commercial company behind Cassandra (database), a NoSQL data store. In theory, these kind of data stores will be needed by companies seeking to operate at “web scale,” and how Riptano figures out how to monetize that need will be interesting. So far companies outside of a niche of HPC and neo-HPC needs (Facebook, pharama companies, etc.) haven’t figured out if/when/why/how for NoSQL stuff, and Riptano will (hopefully for them, because “that’s where the money is”) will answer those questions. Also, see my discussion with Riptano’s Matt Pfeil on make all #006.
  • Dachis Group – these guys are a little too well funded to be a “startup,” but what’s interesting about them is the business model for cashing in on Enterprise 2.0. Following the much maligned new approach at Austin Ventures (to roll-up a bunch of companies private equity style), they’re trying to build up the service and product expertise in the Enterprise 2.0 world (a fancy phrase for collaboration and external facing “engagement” with customers, users, and folks external to your organization) to, in my opinion, either get bought by someone (“Crap! we missed the boat on this Enterprise 2.0 stuff! Get out the check book!”) or…well, unless some miracle happens in the IPO market, yeah, get bought by someone. We discuss Dachis with the Group’s Bryan Menell in episode 7 of the Austin Tech Scene.
  • MindQuilt – a SaaS trying to take the idea of Quora itself to companies, a sort of “private Quora,” if you will. Given how effective this Quora and other sites have been at eliciting interesting and helpful content from people with the Q&A model, it’d be nice to see if that works for closed organizations. It’s a tough job as other Enterprise 2.0 efforts have shown, but those are starting to pan out as more people ask why their corperate IT sucks so much compared to the public, consumer web. Outside of Austin, see Opzi. See my recent interview with their CEO, Daniel Kim.
  • Gowalla – geo-location as the evolution of entertainment and retail/coupon/”how to separate my customers from their cash”/Better Junk Mail is always “interesting.” From a local perspective, what’s most interesting about Gowalla is if they can succeed by being in Austin – or, put another way, bynot being in the bay area. If Gowalla has a big exit, it will do a lot to make (consumer) tech companies believe in Austin as a home.

Others

There are other people in varying degrees of being in stealth and successful enough to rate, of course. I’m sure I’ve left all sorts of people out. Also, there are many companies that have (by my way of rating it) moved way out of being a startup and are now just companies: Indeed.com is a good example, as is the run-away success of HomeAway. They’re a great, interesting company, but have been around a long, long time, by startup standards.

Also, there’s a ton of (iPhone) app companies out there that are “interesting”: TabbedOut (think of a retail and food services world with no cash registers – that’s crazy interesting), QRANK (more interesting from a business model perspective, centralizing all those bar trivia games across the world), Famigo (the idea of iPhone apps as “family time” is interesting, the idea is  featured in William Gibson’s latest book, Zero History, if you’re quick enough to spot it).

And, as a shameless plug, in case you’ve been missing it, we try to cover this kind of stuff (and other Austin tech news) in the Austin Tech Scene podcast.

Disclosure: Spiceworks is a client, as is MindQuilt.

Categories: Ideas, Social Software, Systems Management, The New Thing.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Links for October 11th through October 12th

AT&T MicroCell

A little something extra…

After getting AT&T U-verse last week, I figured I’d finally be eligible for a MicroCell. I picked one up yesterday, and it seems OK so far. After a few more days – maybe a week – of usage, I’ll write a review, also for U-verse which is great so far.

Back to the MicroCell, I just made my first call this morning, to Charles. It worked splendid from my living room where calls usually (a.) flat out don’t work, (b.) get dropped after a few minutes, (c.) the “I am now!” where my phone call gets broken up. Sending txt messages is super fast too, compared to my previous speed: not working at all.

As I Tweetered yesterday, it proves the iPhone QoS rule: the solution to any iPhone problem is to spend more money.

The Links

Disclosure: see the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned.

Categories: Links.

Links for October 8th through October 11th

Central Market, Sunday evening

A little something extra…

The big news today is going to be Windows Phone 7. There’s not a whole lot more going on, which is nice for the PR team there I’m sure.

The Links

Disclosure: see the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned.

Categories: Links.

Makara Update with Issac Roth – a Platform as a Service (PaaS) system

Check out this quick, 7 minute interview for Makara’s progress and some interesting commentary on who’s interested in cloud and PaaS right now.

Last week I ran into Issac Roth, CEO of Makara, and asked him to give a quick update on how his company, Makara, is doing with their PaaS platform. Over lunch at the Rackspace SaaS Summit we’d discussed Makara, the pros and cons of various public cloud providers (always a fun topic), and adoption of cloud technologies, esp., of course, PaaS. We get into some of that in the interview. Also, we talk about migrating applications to the cloud and the types of applications Makara sees being migrated.

While cloud computing has been focused on Infrastructure as a Service of late, in comparision, the layer right above IaaS, Platform as a Service, has only gotten slight attention. The idea of a PaaS is, in my own simplifications, to provide the frameworks, middleware, and other “stuff” built on-top of raw infrastructure needed to create and deliver applications. I don’t know about you, but I find applications slightly more interesting than servers, network gear, and storage.

Transcript

As usual with these un-sponsored episodes, I haven’t spent time to clean up the transcript. If you see us saying something crazy, check the original audio first. There are time-codes where there were transcription problems.

Michael Coté: Well, hello everybody! Here we are at the Rackspace SaaS Summit and actually lovely San Antonio, next to Fiesta Texas. A nice amusement park afterwards we can go to. And I ran into to Issac here and I thought it would be a good time to catch up on Makara. So, why don’t you introduce yourself and Makara real quickly?

Issac Roth: Okay. Thanks, I’m Issac Roth and the company is Makara, I’ve a little logo here to show.

Michael Coté: And you guys used to be WebappVM?

Issac Roth: We used to be WebappVM.

Michael Coté: That’s right.

Issac Roth: And we changed our name, Makara is the — so the sky, the God of the sky in Hindu mythology rides on a platform called Makara. That’s where the name came from and Makara is for auto scaling and on-boarding Java and J2EE and PHP applications on to clouds, public and private clouds.

So if you have like an application written for J2EE or PHP or LAMP and you want to put it on a cloud for scalability or for development and test agility and you can use Makara to do that and instead of having sys admins do all the work and setup security and auto-scaling and monitoring and everything, Makara is just like a few clicks and it’ll do all that for you, so it’s a nice way to automate all that.

Michael Coté: An earlier, at lunch you were saying you guys run on like, what was it, 12 or 8 different platforms or something underneath?

Issac Roth: You got the number down. So we run on Amazon EC2, Rackspace Cloud, Terremark Cloud which is vCloud, Zen and Eucalyptus.

Michael Coté: And so, is the idea that you take existing, like, PHP and Java apps and move them into it or that you start afresh or that you start anew with it or like what’s the typical sort of way the application meets up with you guys?

Issac Roth: Either is good, but the typical way is people start with an application that they already have. So unlike — so Makara is pretty much a platform as a service, but unlike other platforms as a service where you would be expected to write an application to that new platform and then be locked into that platform.

You can, on Makara take an application that’s written to an existing platform like J2EE or JavaServer Faces or LAMP, it’s kind of a platform, it’s got a stack and it’s got a set of libraries and you can move that into the cloud and get the clouding benefits that you would want from a cloud like auto scaling, ease of use, migration across clouds, easy setup and tear down, new environments quickly and then we do some nice stuff around management, we have nice built-in monitoring.

Michael Coté: Right. And what are the kinds of, like, users and customers you guys are seeing nowadays? Like, what are the, kind of, workloads in applications that you guys are seeing build on top of –?

Issac Roth: We were joking before about work, we would like — if you’re at the hypervisor layer you think of a work load.

Michael Coté: That’s right.

Issac Roth: But yeah, we really service web developers, people that are writing web applications and it’s the kinds of applications we’re seeing our mobile apps, so people — if you write a mobile app that has nothing to do with a platform as a service, but it connects to something and that something is going to be a service running somewhere and that needs to be dynamically scaling, it needs to be elastic.

And if you don’t want to write it on some new fangled platform where you are tied into a vendor, but you want to write it on something you’re familiar with or some open source stack, may be Hibernate and Spring or something like that. We’re seeing a lot of those, so especially in the enterprise people are developing enterprise like mini-sites that are basically a web app.

Michael Coté: All right.

Issac Roth: It gives you partial functionality of the company’s web functionality. And so, that needs a service behind it and if your app becomes popular that service may need to scale. It may come and go or you may get hooked into something else and so that service layer. There is no real word for these like service layer, but that sort of service layer web API layer, people are using Makara for that.

Michael Coté: Right, right. And are there any interesting new types of customers you’re getting more involved with or what?

Issac Roth: Well, the one that maybe you wouldn’t think about is SaaS vendors. So we have a lot of companies that are — they have written software that they wrote in the day when you would install software in someone’s enterprise, in the data center, but now their customers are asking, “Hey! Can you provide this as a service,” but it wasn’t written in multi-tenant.

And so, rather than rewriting this application multi-tenant, you just have to run one for every customer. Well that becomes a little crazy, if you had to setup a server for every customer.

Michael Coté: Right.

Issac Roth: It would be untenable. But what you can do is use a cloud platform like Makara to orchestrate setting up virtual servers and you can even pack multiple customers on a single virtual server. And so that way these bugs are getting — that way you have an automation frame work around being able to offer a service, but for an application that was written single tenant it might be a little bit of a less modern architecture and so that’s pretty cool use case for us.

Michael Coté: Yeah, yeah; it’s sort of ISV transformation, if you will, right.

Issac Roth: Yes, like ISV exactly. ISV becomes transformed into a —

Michael Coté: Into a SaaS.

Issac Roth: Into a SaaS without rewriting the whole application.

Michael Coté: Yeah.

Issac Roth: But for, you know our segment, our niche there is that — it’s for web applications. It has to — it’s not — this isn’t going to work for something that’s based on FileMaker that’s like —

Michael Coté: Or Swing or something.

Issac Roth: Yeah, that’s like a fact —

Michael Coté: Right, right. Yeah.

Issac Roth: And then we were talking earlier about service providers and I think what’s interesting there is you know, web hosting is undergoing a transformation and the next generation of web hosting is really going to be PaaS.

And so, how does a service provider envision themselves in the cloud space and not competing with Amazon on price on this infrastructure, the service layer but offering something more like the hosting that they’re offering today. And I think that’s going to be platform as a service.

Michael Coté: Yeah. It’s sort of the need to climb up the stack from infrastructure and have something else too going on there.

Issac Roth: And if the hosting companies don’t do it, you know there is Azure and there is Google App Engine and stuff that’s going to come along and threatens to really disrupt that and take away that business and I think that the people who are hosting sites they’re expecting a higher level of service.

Michael Coté: Right.

Issac Roth: It’s not just I want to put some four-page website, you know, it wants to be interactive, it wants to have a mobile and developers are more sophisticated. They’re able to — because development tool kits are pretty easy now. You can create really neat applications, but those aren’t just web pages, those are like a whole app has to be deployed.

Michael Coté: All right.

Issac Roth: So you need something if you deploy that too that’ll scale it, that’ll take care of it, that’s not really a hosting site with cPanel anymore, that’s going to be a platform as a service.

Michael Coté: Yeah, yeah. No I think, I mean it’s interesting to get like the platform as a service take — because a lot of the cloud talk is infrastructure, infrastructure, infrastructure right and I mean I sort of feel like at some point we’ll be done with the infrastructure stuff and there is not really that much else you can do with it except save more money.

Issac Roth: Yeah.

Michael Coté: And so you got to start doing something interesting on top of it, and that’s where the applications come in. So yeah, it’s great, thanks for taking the time to go over that with us.

Issac Roth: Yeah, thanks for having me, it was fun.

Categories: Cloud, Programming, RedMonkTV.

Tags:

GroundWork 6.3 – Brief Note

201010110900.jpg

Brief notes are summaries of briefings and conversations I’ve had, with only light “analysis.” This one covers a briefing I had with GWOS’ David Dennis and Simon Bennett.

GroundWork Open Source (or “GWOS”) released version 6.3 of their enterprise IT monitoring stack today, GroundWork Monitor Enterprise. New features and improvements include further Java support (with a native Java agent), dashboard and portal-friendly refinements, and network data from Cacti. As usual, there are other UI tweaks, bug fixes and such.

Of note for trend-watchers is their attention to the iPad as a device: they’ve spent time tweaking the UI to work in that form factor, e.g., where mouse-overs don’t exist for little pop-up windows. Connected to that, during the briefing, David Dennis said, are signs of a begrudging acceptance of IT dashboards among IT staff. While ITSM dashboards have been around forever, he said, GWOS is seeing more interest in dashboards from part of the IT populace that used to poo-poo dashboards.

One of the other IT staff demographics David and Simon Bennett mentioned during the call was a (further) collapsing of IT roles. Instead of having 1-person per silo, people (or “roles”) are expected to manage across more silos. This manifests the need for all-in-one tools or, at least, tools that give a shallow view of everything rather than just a deep view of one thing. Other anecdotes from IT Management land confirm glimmers sort of de-sliofication, but it’s still pretty early for that to be mainstream trend.

See the 6.3 what’s new page for all the details. Simon also has a webcast demo’ing and going over new features.

Quickstart Update

GWOS made a “Quickstart” package of it’s stack a year ago. In this release, it runs at $49 and will monitor up to 50 devices. After that 50 devices for $49, the entry price for QWOS is $2,000 As you would expect from such a low price-point, they’ve seen a good amount of purchases, esp. among the “geeks on wheels” set of “IT pros” that support multiple little shops, you know, dentists and such. These are the bread-and-butter guys of Spiceworks, Solarwinds, and others (way) below the “Big 4” IT Management customer-base. The Quickstart product has grown their customer base over the past year, they said, and given them an addition sub-market – something in-between the open source folks and the enterprise-grade IT staff.

It’s interesting to reflect on how this model compares to open core and freemium approaches, both from the angle of the vendor and the buyer. Many open source (based) IT Management startups have been moving away from their open source “roots,” and after about a year of this, there’s, in theory, enough data to start drawing some conclusions about what works and doesn’t (what drives more downloads, installs, revenue, and then conversions to higher priced offerings). Then there’s weird-birds like Spiceworks, of course, that have different revenue motivators. It’d be fun to get some of them in a room and see what happens.

Disclosure: Groundwork has been a client in the past, as has Solarwinds. Spiceworks is a client. See the RedMonk client list for other relevent clients.

Categories: Brief Notes, Marketing, Open Source, Systems Management.

Tags: , , ,