tecosystems

On Media Centers, Mobile Phones and Form Factor

Share via Twitter Share via Facebook Share via Linkedin Share via Reddit

I’m hoping someone out there can help me here, clue me in as it were. I’ve got something to confess here: like Tim Bray, I’m a bit of a gadget luddite. Seriously. Mr. “I Can’t Wait for Nationwide EV-DO” and Mr. Internet Junkie is just another crotchety old man when it comes to the latest crop of devices.

Earlier this year (or actually, last year now), Mount Beattie erupted over Tim Bray’s suggestion that he wants a phone that’s just, well, a phone. That put me in mind of some comments Jonathan Schwartz had on my post here.

And then yesterday, I was listening to the latest Gillmor Gang (good show BTW, guys), in which one of the many topics was the Windows Media Center. That in turn reminded me of some comments from Wilcox that I found almost shocking; he replaced his TV with a Windows Media Center.

So here’s my question – here’s what I need help with: does form factor all of a sudden not matter with these things?

Let’s take the mobile phone space first; I haven’t used the latest Audiovox phone that Scoble’s pimping, but I have used some of the Treos that many folks rave about. And as cool as they are, I just don’t see them cutting it, even for simple tasks like email. The screens aren’t great and the keyboards are too small. Fine for simple things, perhaps, but as a true PC alternative? I don’t think so. Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t think they’re that great. The problem isn’t primarily technical either, it’s simply a reflection of the fact that I want a decent sized screen I can read, and a keyboard that’s comfortable to write on. Unfortunately, at least for me, that means something larger than a phone I’m ready to carry around.

Media Centers are even more confusing to me. I think for the most part it’s because people have been talking about them as TV replacements, rather than complimentary devices. But I simply can’t figure out why I’d want to trade in even my modestly sized 27 inch Sony WEGA for a 19 inch LCD monitor. I can’t even imagine doing what Wilcox did. If I had to watch TV on a 19 inch monitor I’d probably stop watching TV – and maybe that’d be a good thing. I remember being terribly excited in 1997 when I got my Dell Dimension and it had a 19 inch monitor and a DVD drive. Since 1997, I think I’ve watched a grand total of 2 movies on it. Actually, make that one and a half, since I didn’t make it through the whole second one. The problem was form factor. When I’m looking for a better multimedia experience, that usually means bigger screen and better audio, not the ability to browse my stored photos. That’d be a nice addition, but nothing worth paying 2 grand for. A 32 inch flat screen? That’s worth 2 grand.

The key advances in these respective spaces to me are essentially the convergence of broadband, local and cellular networks. Not new hardware. I do want my mobile phone to have access to a high speed network, just as I want my TV to be able to connect to movies, phoots, etc that I have stored on my LAN.

But frankly, my Nokia 6200’s about as big as I want my phone to get, while my WEGA can’t get big enough. It’s all about form factor. That’s why I simply don’t understand the buzz around some of these new products, but maybe some of you can help me get it.

Update: Mike D says exactly what I’m thinking in response to a post of Beattie’s.

7 comments

  1. Writing comfort is one of the key critiques. Expandable, portable, wireless keyboards might diminish its power. So might technology that projects "virtual keyboards" from the processing device to the surface immediately in front of it:
    http://www.alpern.org/weblog/stories/2003/01/09/p

    As for screen size, personal projection screens may or may not pan out:
    http://web.media.mit.edu/~vmb/papers/SID03.pdf

    and
    http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000130025102

    Suppose your Nokia has the functionality of your 100" WEGA and fits in your pocket. That'd be nice.

    But as they are, especially as serious writing tools, mobile devices are weak. Improvements may be on the horizon–obviously there's a demand.

  2. I wrote the above post. I forgot to include my contact info. Sorry.

  3. All that buzz is mostly sales hype, from what I can see. Vendors tend to favor “convergence” because it gives them a new box or widget to pitch, and because the new unit can promote additional vendor lock-in. You may need fewer steps to get something done with a converged device, but look down and you’re wearing new concrete shoes. Loosely coupled divergence generally leads to richer customer outcomes than some integrated monolith

    I agree that a strategy of connected devices is the way to go. Just give me a simple software glue and I will glue-up what I need, how I need it. For me, the one form factor that counts is the Web. Everything else is a matter of personal choice.

  4. I can't speak about what Joe Wilcox did but with Media Center 2005 you can hook it up to any TV. I hooked my families up to their 27" Sony Triniton while my Media Center is hooked up to a 47" Samsung DLP, and at work my Media Center is hooked up to a 21" CRT monitor.

    What I'm getting at is that the majority of Media Centers ship with a wide variety of video out options enabling you to connect it to whatever output device you prefer.

    Matt
    (A program manager on Microsoft's Media Center team)

  5. Eric – i agree, one of the areas I find most promising is the wireless/infrared virtual keyboards. they look funky, but take up no space. am watching them closely.

    Brian – we're definitely aligned on the device as sale factor. if i'm a handset manufacturer, do i want you to buy a device that provides connectivity or a device that is the user endpoint itself? the latter, because it costs more. but like Bray, i really just want something that will allow me to connect with my preferred browsing/email platform – my laptop.

    Matt – interesting. one question, and i know MSFT doesn't control this, but are there Media Center units available that are headless, designed expressly to be plugged in to a TV? b/c most of the ones that i've seen come complete with monitor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *