Blogs

RedMonk

Skip to content

Bob Muglia Leaving Microsoft – Quick Analysis

Bob Muglia Leaving

(Above: Wordle tag cloud of Steve Ballmer’s letter on BobMu leaving.)

Microsoft’s Bob Muglia is leaving Microsoft later this year, and he seems like the decision wasn’t entirely his, as CEO Steve Ballmer put it: “I have decided that now is the time to put new leadership in place for STB.”

It’s always rash to speculate on executive departures. Whether it’s a “disagreement over strategy” (kind of like “artistic differences?”), failure to perform, pursing “new opportunities,” or just “moving on,” you never really know Speculating the reasons early on are little more than a fun parlor game (which is a fine, bike shed way to spend time if you’re looking for entertainment).

But…since some people have asked, here’s my speculation free commentary:

A good track record

Without a doubt, “BobMu” has a good track record, helping build up the $15B business that is Microsoft’s Server and Tools Business. Data centers and the IT department being an otherwise “boring” (compared to XBox or consumer Windows) money-maker, cloud computing has pushed this category of IT into the forefront, in addition to the usual data center and IT department needs which haven’t suddenly gone away. From the number of times Ballmer mentions cloud in the email (four), and how he mentions it (“Once again, Microsoft and our STB team are defining the future of business computing”), you can see that cloud computing is a big deal for Microsoft, as it should be.

Muglia has always struck me as one of the more personable and smart executives out there. His “fire-side chats” at analyst events are always fun, interesting, and full of good, useful tidbits. A little while ago when I spoke to a reporter about IBM’s Steve Mills, Muglia came to mind as a solid tech executive that under-appreciated.

The state of things

PDC10

(Above: the most dressed down I’ve ever seen Bob Muglia, at PDC 2010.)

Microsoft has its share of criticism: the prevailing view is that they’ve been flat as a stock for a decade, or so (I’m no financial guy, so I can’t really speak to that); that mobile thing hasn’t worked out (yet, Microsoft folks in their humblest of moments would hasten to ad); and while there’s been lots of cloud talk from them (and build out!), many say that the pick up isn’t there “what like we’d like to see by now.”

Still, when you look at Windows Server numbers, becoming more heterogeneous and slightly more open (if still not enough), the care and feeding they’ve put into cloud, and jarring (and somewhat ill-handled pivot) but good moves like going for HTML5, I wouldn’t say this part of Microsoft has been unimaginative or anywhere near a disaster. There’s plenty of hard work to do, technologically and marketing-wise, but there’s a good base and pace to start from.

For those who demand fun

I’ll leave you with one of James Governor’s tweeters from this morning on the topic, for entertainment purposes only:

201101101520.jpg

Question(s) to you, dear readers: What do you think the reasons for leaving are? How will it effect Microsoft’s server and cloud efforts?

More

Disclosure: Microsoft is a client.

Categories: Cloud, Companies, Enterprise Software, Quick Analysis.

Tags: , , ,

Links for January 5th through January 6th

Mac App Store

Disclosure: see the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned.

Categories: Links.

I just got a broken record in the mail

EMC Record Breaking

Every-now-and-then I get a funny piece of PR snail-mail – a lot less than you’d think. The UPS guy just dropped off a package with the above “broken record” from EMC. There’s a related website, and an event in Jan 18th.

Yay for the PR machine on this one, I guess 😉

Here’s the front and bag of the record put back together:

The broken record assembled

Categories: Marketing.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Links for January 4th through January 5th

A little something extra…

In case you haven’t noticed, we’ve sort of “soft launched” another blog here at RedMonk: MonkGear. Stephen and I have been posting a tad there, when we find the time, reviewing things, mostly tech junk. That said, I’m excited to use it for some of the more, uh, “tech life-style” things I’d like to do, like the tea latte tasting above.

Check it out, and tell us what you think – and what types of things you’re curious about!

The Links

Disclosure: see the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned.

Categories: Links.

Links for January 4th

Disclosure: see the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned.

Categories: Links.

Links for December 28th through January 4th

"Rum Ponche" - Egg Nog receipe

It’s the last of the holiday link stewer below, along with some from yesterday. Here’s to 2011!

Disclosure: see the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned.

Categories: Links.

Links for December 17th through December 28th

I’ve been on vacation for Christmas; the links have been building up. Here’s a long list of links for your holiday reading pleasure.

Disclosure: see the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned.

Categories: Links.

All-in-a-box vs. Big 4

The White Boxes

I talk with the press frequently. They thankfully whack down my ramblings into concise quotes. For those who prefer to see more, I try to dump publish slightly polished up conversations I have with press into Press Pass.

Barbara Darrow of TechTarget recently asked me what effect unified, single-stack servers could have on the existing IT Management landscape. If these offerings, like Cisco’s UCS are really “everything you need in a box,” what place do traditional, 3rd party systems management vendors have? Here’s my response:

When it comes to unified devices, I don’t see the dynamics changing dramatically. At the moment, while things like monitoring and event management are required to run IT, they’re not big cash cows for large systems management companies compared to higher level functions like service desks, the process around service management, reporting, and keeping up with virtualization and self-service portals (which is what a lot of what “private cloud” ends up being).

One of the major problems with these bundled systems management offerings is that they tend to only work well with the hardware or software stacks they’re bundled with. You still need to monitor all that other stuff you have: like your Microsoft software, your routers, SAP installs, Unix boxes, etc. I typically see these embedded systems management offerings used as the best way to drill down and diagnose a problem on that system [the end-to-end stuff demo’ed at SpringOne 2010 from VMWare/SpringSource is an excellent example], but the staff tends to use a general purpose monitoring tool to keep track of everything in IT on a day-to-day basis. There’s also a tremendous amount of concreted-in legacy that requires monitoring, despite what fancy new “cloud in a box” machines might offer. Of course, if all you have as a UCS or the like, you may be set.

Raw monitoring hasn’t been an incredibly hot area for sometime, so there’s not a tremendous amount to loose. The more important turf is the software around helping IT manage change requests, keep track of assets, and otherwise assist in the processes and workflows IT goes through day-to-day…and then reporting on all of that for upper-level management who need all the muck below them summarized in a dashboard, or report, to help make decisions about what to keep doing, what to starve or kill, and new IT services to start.

Others like IBM Tivoli are smartly moving into other industries (like monitoring power grids, city infrastructure, etc.) where new networks are emerging and require monitoring afresh. If everything is IP-addressable and on a network, you can tweak your data center monitoring tools and apply them to, say, large power grids or even “nodes” in waste-water management. This last point is pretty unique to IBM.

Cisco has partnered with BMC around UCS, which is evidence of BMC keeping “in the game” despite Cisco trying to capture more of the data center dollars.

Buyers tend to maintain a healthy skepticism about buying everything from one vendor: the other side of “one throat to choke” is “one big check to write.” Instead, buyers tend to still like the ability to pit vendors against each other to drive down cost and get better service.

But, to your point, all of the vendors are going crazy for this one check to write approach: Oracle would love to see people buy their entire stack, as would IBM, and Dell’s VIS are all going towards this idea.

Disclosure: IBM and Dell are clients, as is Microsoft.

Categories: Enterprise Software, Press Pass, Systems Management.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Links for December 16th through December 17th

Disclosure: see the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned.

Categories: Links.

100 apps in 100 days contest

Earlier this week, I helped judge the 100 days 100 apps contest put on by RedMonk client Alcatel-Lucent. I always like judging these types of application development contests to get a sense of what’s possible on different platforms.

The entries I looked over all were going for interesting ways to use the actual carrier networks (through services provided by Alcatel-Lucent kit and services, of course). My favorites involved auto-tracking of people through GPS and the networks – instead of having to manually “check-in” to various places, you could turn the services on to do that in the background.

The winner, which I thought was the top app, was called Late Runner:

Named “Late Runner,” Skrypachova’s application showcases the power of Alcatel-Lucent’s Application Enablement vision, which combines the trusted capabilities of service providers with the speed and innovation of the Web to enable a new generation of services and provide both consumers and business users with richer mobile experiences. Leveraging SMS and location APIs, the application enables end users to manage their day-to-day interactions with friends, family and co-workers by letting them track their physical whereabouts, informing them when they will be late to appointments, and providing an estimated arrival time. Built-in privacy controls allow end users to manage who they want to share their information with.

Read more about it and the runner-ups in the announcement released today and you can check out the details on their Top Coder page.

Disclosure: Alcatel-Lucent is a client.

Categories: Development Tools.

Tags: , , , ,