-
this is an excellent piece that describes perfectly why i feel that judging popular web properties solely on the basis of revenue generated may lead to undervaluation. the data - in the right hands - can have immense value
-
“Eric mentions my interest in his D-Bus JS bindings. True - I am interested! ” - same here.
-
pretty nice setup, Senor Barr
-
cool. hope the “momentous changes” are for the better.
-
“Ever come across one of those Facebook Platform applications that required you to spam a dozen of your friends with invites before you could access the results…? They’re annoying. And now Facebook has done something about it” - finally
Popularity: 2% [?]
One Comment
I think the argument still leads to a revenue discussion. If Google can capture all that data and it’s of value, then it should fundamentally increase it’s ability to generate revenue. Revenue can come from many different sources, but “being popular” does not mean that a web property will generate returns. Buying a company has to return something to the shareholders… I still think some of the recent activity and rumors of activity involve speculative, unfounded cases…. but that’s just me…
BTW, I think Senor Barr needs to try Ubuntu… would make his office look better
Post a Comment