-
more RedMonk schwag action
-
these threats are growing very tiresome; rumor has it this presentation wasn’t well received, incidentally
-
Shankland sums up nicely and effectively the dilemma that KVM represents
-
“As the convoy pulled out of the gravel field, the Lt. saw what appeared to be a brand new 15 by 15 hooch, newly painted. It appeared to be made out of raw wood. The family moving in appeared to be happy.” – reuse in the real world
-
very interesting news from the Joyent guys, who are trying to help Corel bridge the online/offline worlds – the approach is interesting, and i’ll reserve judgement on the partner/tool until i see it
-
interesting observation from Josh re: the traction of Postgres w/in the DW ISV market
-
has anybody out the upgraded to Feisty yet? i’m wondering what’s going to break if i do
-
with all due respect to to Dave Dargo (who’s quite smart), i’m not sure how many folks are interested in debating the semantics of what a “database” is, or restricting their definition to those that handle recovery
-
speaking of MySQL, interesting use cases as documented by Zack – for a minute i thought Pingdom did this in an automated fashion, which would have been fascinating (if impossible), but not so – standard survey work
-
here’s the survey, summarized; good, if unsurprising, news for the LAMP stack
-
i’m going to have to talk about this at some point; not looking forward to it
-
i’ve often thought that the UK’s arms length attitude towards open source was perplexing, but at least they have a sensible attitude towards software patents
Related posts:
2 Comments
Re: Feisty, I’ve been running it on my multimedia box for a while, and all looks good there, but I admit I haven’t upgraded on my primary work box.
“restricting their definition [of DBs] to those that handle recovery”
Boy, move him up to #1 on the list of people who dabble is going to blindside.
Luis: thanks for checking in. i’ll probably wait a month or two, then make the jump. i love the bleeding edge
re: Dargo, i agree. it’s not that he doesn’t have a point, and he clearly acknowledges the marketplace success and demand for MySQL style offerings, i’m just not – given that – why the definition of a database is worth debating.
Post a Comment