{"id":113,"date":"2019-07-31T15:49:41","date_gmt":"2019-07-31T19:49:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/?p=113"},"modified":"2020-07-29T09:32:14","modified_gmt":"2020-07-29T13:32:14","slug":"june-2019-redmonk-programming-language-rankings-monkchat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/2019\/07\/31\/june-2019-redmonk-programming-language-rankings-monkchat\/","title":{"rendered":"The June 2019 RedMonk Programming Language Rankings: a MonkChat"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The June 2019 iteration of the RedMonk Programming Language Rankings is brought to you by YLD.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">YLD is behind many of the products and services you use every day. We create cutting edge technology and design capabilities that last beyond us. We\u2019re experts in open source tech such as node.js, react.js, React Native, Kubernetes and design systems. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.yld.io\/\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Get in touch!<\/span><\/i><\/a><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/jgovernor\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">James Governor<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">): The purpose of this chat is to discuss the findings of the June 2019 RedMonk Programming Language Rankings, sponsored by our good friends at YLD<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Were there any surprises, what&#8217;s going on, and what did we learn this term?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">RedMonk publishes rankings every six months, and we felt it would be good to have a discussion this time around, and get behind the numbers and charts if we can.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We also asked for questions from third parties, and hopefully we can answer some of those.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/rstephens\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rachel Stephens<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">):For those who didn\u2019t see it, here is <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/sogrady\/2019\/07\/18\/language-rankings-6-19\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">the aforementioned research<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/rstephens\/2019\/07\/18\/top20-june-2019\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">trends over\u00a0 time can be seen here<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/rstephens\/files\/2019\/07\/top20_201906.png\" width=\"1000\" height=\"750\" \/><\/p>\n<p><b>kelly <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Kelly Fitzpatrick<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">):\u00a0 OK, to start off: any general impressions of this round of the Programming Language Rankings?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/sogrady\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Stephen O\u2019Grady<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">): My biggest takeaway from this round of the rankings was TypeScript. It\u2019s the first new entrant into the Top 10 outside of a one quarter cameo from Swift since 2015. The growth behind the language has been impressive to watch.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> So about TypeScript &#8211; we got a little excited about the language&#8217;s progress last time, and it seems that interest was justified. What&#8217;s happening everyone?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0 Two big factors in its success:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> JavaScript\u2019s ubiquity and ascent to lingua franca status<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The (optional) safety offered by the language\u2019s typing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>rachel:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> I also think that the ability to refactor an app by mixing and matching TypeScript and JavaScript is a big part of the story.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Safety is popular these days for many reasons, as Capital One (most recently) has emphasized.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Agreed, @rachel. TypeScript\u2019s ability to intermingle with JavaScript allows it to ride the latter\u2019s coattails, much like Kotlin with Java.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Can&#8217;t overstate the truth of the point made by @rachel. The Javascript Typescript adjacency is very very powerful as a vector for adoption.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span><b>rachel: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">TypeScript\u2019s focus on being tool-friendly is also huge. Tools are such an important part of developer productivity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Probably doesn\u2019t hurt also that one of the most popular tools, VS Code, is written in TypeScript. <\/span><b><br \/>\n<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><b>monkchips:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Built by some of the same people that created the language&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It&#8217;s a really big win for Microsoft.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><\/b><b>kelly:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Agreed; and the compatibility of necessities like testing frameworks also seems key to me.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><\/b><b>monkchips:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0 Testing frameworks, great point. Any in particular in mind that have done a good job with TypeScript?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>kelly:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The lovely thing about Typescript is that usually&#8211;at least for unit tests&#8211;you can use whatever JavaScript framework you already love.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So it seems that TypeScript was big this time around; were there any surprises specific to the June 2019 rankings?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> I feel like a turnover in the Top 10 is the biggest news. The top programming languages are relatively stable given that our metrics are accretive over time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Agreed. I did get this tweet which might be worth discussing\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">HCL\u2019s position on the chart is surprising, I\u2019m guessing that\u2019s because users on StackOverflow are more likely to tag \u201cterraform\u201d than \u201cHCL\u201d in their posts?<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jon Topper (@jtopper) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/jtopper\/status\/1156100179659042816?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">July 30, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To be honest I had never really thought of Hashicorp Configuration Language&#8217;s place in the rankings at all before.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">But Hashicorp has talked about it a bit recently, and it was notable that GitHub chose to use it with Actions.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It seems like an interesting outlier &#8211; quite a bit of GitHub activity but very little in Stack Overflow<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Looks like it clocks in at #62 this time around. Will be interesting to see if it rises.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> I imagine the hypothesis around adjacent tags has merit on the Stack Overflow side, though I\u2019d have to go look to confirm.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> GitHub Actions feels like such an interesting potential context and vector for further adoption. Actions workflows are written in HCL<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ah, that\u2019s interesting: HCL was #70 in January, so #62 is a fair jump, though admittedly the distinctions are less meaningful that far down.<\/span><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> We often get pushback about the rankings for communities that gather and collaborate outside of Stack Overflow.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>kelly:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> We definitely had some questions around the processes used to create the rankings.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> This is a similar objection. Our process is to correlate trends from two publicly available data sets (namely GitHub and Stack Overflow) to try to see what it tells us about usage and discussion.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There are many communities that collaborate in places other than Stack Overflow, and we simply can\u2019t expand to all possible data sources (partially because not all data sources have publicly facing data, but also because we the process would not scale.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The same logic applies to tags. We try to catch the primary tags associated with a language, but we can\u2019t expand to all the adjacent tags.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>kelly:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> We did get one question around YAML (that begs the larger question of what is considered a &#8220;programming language&#8221;):\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Should YAML be considered a programming languages? And if it was, where on the rankings would it fall?<\/p>\n<p>Also, when is this chat and is it open to an audience? Would love to join.<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Gareth Rushgrove (@garethr) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/garethr\/status\/1156175828365058051?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">July 30, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">YAML is currently a language folks love to hate, but it&#8217;s utterly ubiquitous. It&#8217;s definitely not a &#8220;computer science&#8221; language, but it&#8217;s a get shit done language. Folks like Pulumi and Atomist are actively arguing its use is harmful.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The reason it\u2019s not included in our rankings is because GitHub is not including it in their data.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Right. We try to make as few editorial decisions as possible, so until GitHub\u2019s Linguist project considers YAML a language it\u2019s not eligible for inclusion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We might have to talk to GitHub about that!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So&#8230;I have a question about Python. It&#8217;s there, well-established in the top three now, it&#8217;s become a lingua franca for data science, it&#8217;s proved itself general purpose. Or has it? I have been noticing some chatter from folks recently that are seemingly arguing we might be at Peak Python, because while it has found a place in AI\/ML, it&#8217;s not really nailing other opportunities. That is, might it face stronger headwinds going forward?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I think they\u2019d say: PR\u2019s welcome!<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">And we&#39;d welcome pull requests for new languages if they meet the in-the-wild usage requirement: <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/2N6jwP0Ts5\">https:\/\/t.co\/2N6jwP0Ts5<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Paul Chaignon @pchaigno@hachyderm.io (@pchaigno) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/pchaigno\/status\/1153018106194907136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">July 21, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Re: Python, there\u2019s so much of it out there in so many places for so many things that it\u2019s not going anywhere for a while. That said, there could still be something to the Peak Python argument because it lacks the clarity of purpose and design that, say, an R has, but isn\u2019t likely to challenge JavaScript\/TypeScript for ubiquity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Right.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Which raises the question of what its path is moving forward, and what opportunities it\u2019s positioned for. Still, I wouldn\u2019t bet against Python. It\u2019s good at so many things.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Guido van Rossum stepped aside as language overlord, and without a benevolent dictator, arguments about language direction are likely to increase.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> But it\u2019s the Python community, so the arguments will still be welcoming.<br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-114\" src=\"http:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/files\/2019\/07\/smile.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"36\" height=\"36\" \/><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><br \/>\nkelly:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Also re: Python: in an informal conversation with some .NET and Java devs, there was bafflement over how high Python fell in our rankings. At the same time, almost everyone I know that is starting to code starts with Python.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> @sogrady: Agree wholeheartedly plenty of life left in the old dog yet, but I have definitely been noticing an uptick of negative chatter lately from long time users of the language\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> @rachel as an aside, Python is welcoming, but has nothing on Haskell\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">\u201cwhat happens when you troll the haskell community\u201d: <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/emW92JjiNj\">https:\/\/t.co\/emW92JjiNj<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; steve o&#39;grady (@sogrady) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/sogrady\/status\/464739310693277696?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">May 9, 2014<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So what&#8217;s Haskell doing this time around?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It\u2019s been hanging steady at 19 since 2017.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>kelly: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Switching gears, is there anything that you see potentially changing in the process that we use for the language rankings? Any fine-tuning that we should consider (or changes that might be driven from external factors)?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Selfishly, I would love if the answer was no.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Same. Process changes are the worst, and I\u2019m not even the one who has to bear the brunt of it, @rachel is.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Realistically, the world always changes. Data format\/availability changes are occasionally inevitable. And then there\u2019s the questions that come around whether we need to adapt the process overall to more communities, etc.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Right now we\u2019ve found GitHub and Stack Overflow to have large developer traction and publicly available data. But as we pointed out above, these sources are far from giving us a universal picture of language use.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Evolution is good, it really might be interesting to look at GitLab and Bitbucket data, given their enterprise footprints, but obviously that&#8217;s making work for you, and would potentially be a &#8220;breaking change&#8221; on our timeline.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">People ask often about expanding our source data. I feel like that might add interesting color, but it also would make views of languages over time less relevant when you do that big of a process change. It\u2019s a balancing act.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>kelly:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Are there any changes we are considering in how we present the information as we currently gather it? @monkchips: you have had requests for information on languages that do not end up in the publicly available Top 20:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/monkchips?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@monkchips<\/a> are the language rankings past 20 public, or part of paid access? Didn&#39;t see a full list from perusing. Just wondering where coldfusion and Delphi are&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Ken (@kenhorn) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/kenhorn\/status\/1155959638484848641?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">July 29, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">: For Ken Horn the short answer is no, we don&#8217;t have secret list below the fold for paying customers. Is he planning to write some ColdFusion?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">@monkchips there is no secret list, but we have periodically looked at downranked languages for clients who want to know how something is trending outside of the Top 20.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I can\u2019t see the rankings as we currently run them changing for that reason; we have almost a decade\u2019s worth of continuity to preserve. But it\u2019s certainly possible that we could see additional ranking types added at some point in the future.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We could have a language rankings FORK!<br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-117 alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/files\/2019\/07\/rofl.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"42\" height=\"39\" \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>kelly:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-116 alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/files\/2019\/07\/Scream.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"40\" height=\"38\" \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Haha yeah that\u2019s not happening.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> That\u2019s the beauty of open data sets. You are welcome to fork, @monkchips.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady:<\/b><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-115\" src=\"http:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/files\/2019\/07\/joy.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"42\" height=\"37\" \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I have to admit that @rachel: having the most epic troll ever is something I did not see coming.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>kelly: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We are close to time, so one final question:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Any predictions on what we might see in our 2020 rankings (either in the rankings themselves or in a fork from James)?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> I predict James will not fork.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> I\u2019m curious to see what the future holds for Go. On the one hand, it\u2019s very well regarded technically and a foundation for numerous large, critical projects. On the other, it\u2019s use cases are relatively narrow and there has been a fair amount of community dissent over input, or rather the lack thereof, in its evolution.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It\u2019s never placed higher than #14, IIRC, and I don\u2019t expect it to see that again anytime soon.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> I\u2019m hoping Rust cracks the top 20 at some point.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>monkchips: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">HCL and we should really encourage @GitHub to track YAML.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>sogrady:\u00a0 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Yes, we\u2019ll have to keep an eye on HCL. Rust I expect to hit the Top 20 if not next run, the one after that. The trendline is pretty clear, and if this comes true Rust would get an immediate boost:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Microsoft is exploring using the Rust programming language as an alternative to C, C++ in the name of better security: <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/nJZmcOPWXe\">https:\/\/t.co\/nJZmcOPWXe<\/a> (by ZDNet&#39;s <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/campuscodi?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@campuscodi<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Mary Jo Foley (@maryjofoley) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/maryjofoley\/status\/1151482671928946689?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">July 17, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><b>kelly: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And I vote that we do another language rankings chat in 2020&#8211;this has been great!\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>rachel: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Indeed! Thanks, team!<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The June 2019 iteration of the RedMonk Programming Language Rankings is brought to you by YLD. YLD is behind many of the products and services you use every day. We create cutting edge technology and design capabilities that last beyond us. We\u2019re experts in open source tech such as node.js, react.js, React Native, Kubernetes and<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":47,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[42,33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-113","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-language-rankings","category-slackchat"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/47"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=113"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=113"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=113"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/kfitzpatrick\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=113"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}