---
title: "On Google and constraints: DHH agrees (concisely)"
date: 2006-02-15T19:13:37Z
modified: 2006-02-15T19:13:37Z
permalink: "https://redmonk.com/jgovernor/on-google-and-constraints-dhh-agrees-concisely/"
type: post
status: publish
excerpt: ""
wpid: 505
categories:
  - Uncategorized
timestamp: 2006-02-15T19:13:37Z
tags:
  - Uncategorized
---

I just got a trackback from from [David Heinemeier Hannson](http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/how_constrained_is_google_really.php). I love blogs.



Not surprisingly his take is somewhat more concise than mine…

> Google would surely be one of the last companies I would ever file under &#147;big in constraints&#148;. The company hires ten times the size of 37signals _every week_. They chase a thousand science projects while collecting a billion dollars per quarter in revenue.
> 
> No harm in that, naturally. Google is great at what it does: Solving really hard problems by throwing more ph.d&#146;s, money, servers, and resources at it than most small countries have at their disposal. In effect, they&#146;re a celebrating the triumph of an abundance of resources: Making all information searching for the whole world.
> 
> But champions of constraint now? Hmmm.

I still have a blog in the hopper from last week’s Carson show about David’s speech. He is a lot more combative than I expected, which is goodness… more on that later.