James Governor's Monkchips

Get These Facts

Share via Twitter Share via Facebook Share via Linkedin Share via Reddit

I look forward to seeing MS response to this research from Stanford. It turns out Linux does not suck.

From Wired

Linux advocates have long insisted that open-source development results in better and more secure software. Now they have statistics to back up their claims.

According to a four-year analysis of the 5.7 million lines of Linux source code conducted by five Stanford University computer science researchers, the Linux kernel programming code is better and more secure than the programming code of most proprietary software. The report, set to be released on Tuesday, states that the 2.6 Linux production kernel, shipped with software from Red Hat, Novell and other major Linux software vendors, contains 985 bugs in 5.7 million lines of code, well below the industry average for commercial enterprise software. Windows XP, by comparison, contains about 40 million lines of code, with new bugs found on a frequent basis.

No Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *