{"id":734,"date":"2007-04-17T14:10:27","date_gmt":"2007-04-17T20:10:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.redmonk.com\/cote\/2007\/04\/17\/outsourcing-my-feed-reading-info-consumption-with-the-delicious-network\/"},"modified":"2007-04-17T14:10:27","modified_gmt":"2007-04-17T20:10:27","slug":"outsourcing-my-feed-reading-info-consumption-with-the-delicious-network","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/cote\/2007\/04\/17\/outsourcing-my-feed-reading-info-consumption-with-the-delicious-network\/","title":{"rendered":"Outsourcing my Feed Reading: Info Consumption with the del.icio.us network"},"content":{"rendered":"

\nSome years back, I wrote a “Page Two” observing that Hunter S. Thompson<\/a> had been the major literary influence on many letter-writers and would-be [Austin] Chronicle<\/i><\/a> contributors who submitted long, drug-fueled rants of run-on sentences stacked on each other as though that is the way Thompson wrote<\/a>. Really, the only things most of these writers missed was his brilliant sense of style, writing skill, wit, intelligence, and inspiration. —Louis Black<\/a>, see also Bruce Sterling’s SXSW 2007 keynote<\/a>.<\/i>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

As most folks in my line of work, I’m always thinking about my information consumption patterns. Over my online life, I’ve read BBSes, USEnet, hunted text files<\/a> in Gopher<\/a> and WAIS<\/a>, read the web, then blogs, then RSS, podcasts, video casts, email, IM…if there’s a digital way of representing “content,” I’ve tried to eat it.<\/p>\n

That “eating” is a continual process of re-fining and re-learning the best way to go about finding the best things to read and then converting them into my own content.<\/p>\n

The general problem is this: the allure of just “surfing” around is strong, be it in an RSS reader (where you make your own waves to surf) the “raw web,” your email inbox, IRC, IM, or any combination of those. Some may say that the problem is that there’s too much information. Instead, I think I just get charmed by the allure of surfing instead of working<\/i> at consuming that content…with tools and systems that make it possible.<\/p>\n

A vital part of existing in this information sea is producing what I call “original content.” This is content that isn’t just a brain-storm bounce off something else. While original content can be kicked off by other content — all you English and Philosophy majors out there know this is how knowledge works across time — the point is that there are new ideas and perspectives, if only judgments<\/i> in original content.<\/p>\n

As Bruce Sterling said in some podcast<\/a>, it’s easy and fun<\/i> to sit around and “be a genius.” Actually producing something is the hard part.<\/p>\n

Consume, Talk, Judge, Produce, GOTO “Consume”<\/h2>\n

This weekend, while Kim was slaving away for Freedom, I fiddled around with the below diagram:<\/p>\n

\n\"Information-to-Content\"<\/a><\/p>\n

I went a little nuts there, but the key thing I started with was that top box, and it’s the topic for the rest of the below.<\/p>\n

Reading Feeds<\/h2>\n

I’ve wanted to re-do the way I “read feeds.” Currently, I just have a pile of groups\/folders with RSS feeds in them. I’ve got one for RedMonk stuff, one for my stuff, one for systems management, one for RedMonk customers, one for general code monkeyerier, one for news, etc. You can see a flattened list of my subscriptions over on my OPML.org page<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Over the past 3 weeks I’ve sort of been ignoring the feeds on a daily basis. About once a week, I’ll go in a whack through a bunch of them. I went from 7,000+ unread the 3,000+ (still!) this past Sunday.<\/p>\n

To me, this system is broken. I haven’t properly narrowed down and prioritized the feeds. The problem is, most feeds are of inconsistent priority. RedMonk feeds and my own are always top priority because they’re part of “me,” but other ones come and go in importance. I’ve been abusive towards all my friends feeds the most: you’d think I’d read those all the time, but I read them the least.<\/p>\n

Now, let me clarify something: the system is broken for my need<\/i>, my professional<\/i> need. That need is to find the smartest, coolest, most helpful posts and pointers for what’s going in the world of software and hi-tech in general. Then, as the diagram above shows, be part of the input for me producing content in the form of blog posts, conversations, or anything else.<\/p>\n

It’s not at all broken for me just wanted to have fun: I could spend all day just reading through all those feeds if all I wanted to do was entertain myself. But, my needs are in addition to entertainment. (And I’ve got all that damn travel and meeting planning to do as well ;>)<\/p>\n

So, I got to thinking: what’s a new approach?<\/p>\n

del.icio.us network<\/h2>\n

My current theory, which I’ve yet to put into practice, is to find the top 10% feeds (screw that 80\/20<\/a> hogwash! if the creationist wanted to piss off the Goddless, secular humanists, they outta ask how everything can so conveniently be split into 80\/20…surely a Divine Intelligence must be behind such slashery) and just subscribe to those. Then, I’ll subscribe to my del.icio.us network<\/a> which I’ve been slowly gardening over the past year or so.<\/p>\n

\n\"del.icio.us\/network\/bushwald\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The del.icio.us network isn’t the wonderful for:<\/code> thing I’ve mentioned before. Instead, it’s a way of:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. declaring, yet again, who your “friends” are in some web app (del.icio.us), and, more importantly<\/li>\n
  2. aggregating all the bookmarks from said friends.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    I used to read my del.icio.us network in addition<\/i> to all my feeds. But, as I got up to 20, 30, 50, now 72 people in my network, it was too much. In fact, it often gets up the 1,000’s of items before I whack at it.<\/p>\n

    The thing is, all those bookmarks in my del.icio.us network are often awesome. My theory of why is this:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. People I “friend” in del.icio.us are often interested in several of the same things I am.<\/li>\n
    2. If someone goes to the trouble to bookmark something in del.icio.us, it’s probably quite good. Otherwise, why bother?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Now, it’s not a sure perfect system: there’re duplicates, and I don’t always care about some of the links. But, combined with the terse descriptions\/commentary (hints of Twitter 140 character limits to updates here, eh? Eh?) I often find more usefulness and happiness in the del.icio.us network than my pile of feeds.<\/p>\n

      Other Sources<\/h2>\n

      Now, there are other info sources:<\/p>\n