{"id":1304,"date":"2008-04-16T09:49:25","date_gmt":"2008-04-16T15:49:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.redmonk.com\/cote\/2008\/04\/16\/getting-love-and-attention-for-your-whizbang-20-application-fast-frequent-features\/"},"modified":"2008-04-16T09:49:25","modified_gmt":"2008-04-16T15:49:25","slug":"getting-love-and-attention-for-your-whizbang-20-application-fast-frequent-features","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/cote\/2008\/04\/16\/getting-love-and-attention-for-your-whizbang-20-application-fast-frequent-features\/","title":{"rendered":"Getting &quot;Love&quot; (and Attention) for Your Whizbang 2.0 Application &#8211; Fast, Frequent Features"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last month, Adobe evangelist Ryan Stewart <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.digitalbackcountry.com\/?p=1345\">asked why Adobe Share doesn&#8217;t get as much attention as other document sharing services<\/a>. Without picking on all the gory details of Share itself, the main way I see Whizbang 2.0 services getting attention is  by frequently integrating with out Whizbang 2.0 services. By integration I mean simply the simplest, easiest thing you can think of (or complex if you want, but the bar is low), and by frequently, I mean monthly, if not 2 or 3 times a month.<\/p>\n<p>Any online service like this should be more of a highway (fast and connected) instead of a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cul-de-sac\">cul-de-sac<\/a> that barely connects to the rest of the web.<\/p>\n<h2>What is Share?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"embed\">\n<p>Adobe Share is exactly what it sounds like: a way to share documents and other &#8220;objects.&#8221; It&#8217;s a Flex based application and has things like &#8220;limit who can see my stuff,&#8221; embedding Flash widgets to look at the documents (as above), and converting documents to PDF. More detail <a href=\"http:\/\/redmonk.com\/cote\/2007\/10\/01\/adobe-goes-saas-applications-buzzword-and-project-share\/\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.readwriteweb.com\/archives\/adobe_announces_document_shari.php\">elsewhere<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>&#8220;Good cooking takes time. If you are made to wait, it is to serve you better, and to please you.&#8221;<\/h2>\n<p>From what I can tell, Share breaks the rule of thumb of integrating early, integrating often. You can get a URL or widget embed out of it, but you can&#8217;t, for example, tell it &#8220;go synchronize documents between here and Google Docs.&#8221; I have no idea if Google Docs makes that possible, but, whatever, if I start thinking too much like that I&#8217;ll fall into being a developer instead of a user.<\/p>\n<p>Or, what if I wanted to share a document to Twitter? There&#8217;s no &#8220;post to Twitter&#8221; link. Can I post to a blog from within Share? Is there a Facebook widget? To get slightly less consumer web, more enterprise: what about synching with SharePoint or a wiki? Or Buzzword even? How about a plugin for MS-Word that lets me save to Share?<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong here, I actually like Share, <i>a lot<\/i>. The first time I saw it, my first thought was that RedMonk could use it for our long &#8220;under construction PDF library. We have a &#8220;stack&#8221; of old, and some new, PDFs that we don&#8217;t really collect in one place too well. I&#8217;m a big fan of PDFs for this kind of thing, and I love the PDF reading you can do in Share.<\/p>\n<h2>When Switching Costs Are Zero, Don&#8217;t Let &#8216;Em Turn that Dial<\/h2>\n<p>The larger point is that in a SaaS world, the old release schedules of, well, taking a long time, don&#8217;t really work out too well. You want to put out new releases, even only for one feature, <i>all the time<\/i>. Otherwise, as Ryan notes, you find that people forget about you, and maintaining that continuous trickle of attention is vital for SaaS applications.<\/p>\n<p>More so than packaged, installed software, there&#8217;s virtually no switching cost in a SaaS world. There&#8217;s moving data, sure, but for the most part, that&#8217;s nullified as a concern by a few things: the data in question is of low value enough that it doesn&#8217;t need to be moved, the data can be easily imported and exported (as with most address books), or, you simply don&#8217;t <i>need<\/i> to migrate the data (you can keep serving up videos at YouTube if you switch to blip.tv).<\/p>\n<p>The primary way to stave this off is to keep adding new features &#8211; again, even minor, &#8220;meaningless&#8221; ones &#8211; to keep your users attention. Most importantly, as new, exciting services come along, integrating closely with those services helps keep users around as well. This is especially true if you&#8217;re a platform like Share.<\/p>\n<h2>Accelerating Share<\/h2>\n<p>So, what are some things Share could do? Here&#8217;s some featurettes:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Use OpenID &#8211; really, no one likes vendor-wide identity like Adobe ID, or Microsoft Passport, or whatever. We all carp about the lack of consumer single sign-on, but a vendor-based ID that&#8217;s used on their web-site ends up causing more harm than good. Integrating with something like OpenID grabs attention, attracts new developers to help you build on the platform, and has the &#8220;bonus&#8221; (I&#8217;m being tongue in check cynical here) of actually delivering a useful feature beyond hype.<\/li>\n<li>Cross-posting &#8211; allow people to post to their blogs and Twitter. I mean, you gotta work with Twitter, bro&#8217;.<\/li>\n<li>Vacuum up Word &#8211; as mentioned above, make a Word plugin that lets people upload (or download, even!) straight from Word. OK, so this is much more than a &#8220;simple&#8221; feature. I cheated. As mentioned <a href=\"http:\/\/www.redmonk.com\/cote\/2008\/04\/04\/ria-weekly-12-curl-air-on-linux-word-as-ria-javafx-10\/\">I last week on <i>RIA Weekly<\/i><\/a>, though, people tend to forget about using Word as a platform &#8211; an RIA even! Shocker! &#8211; for getting at content.<\/li>\n<li>Don&#8217;t forget the blog &#8211; Share actually has <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.adobe.com\/share\/\">a blog<\/a>. Unfortunately, it&#8217;s not updated too frequently. The icon of success here is how 37signals uses <a href=\"http:\/\/www.37signals.com\/svn\/\">its blog<\/a> to drive attention, traffic, and sales for its portfolio. As an example, the Share blog should have been the one to break <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnet.com\/8301-13846_1-9905449-62.html\">the news that Share uses Alfresco &#8220;everyone&#8217;s favorite open source ECM (enterprise content management) platform.&#8221;<\/a> Other topics: what does a &#8220;document&#8221; mean in a web world? How (e.g., what audiences) and when should I use a PDF instead of a URL\/web page? What is up with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/custom?cx=009365913926268090452%3Abwkt-kj4fbq&amp;q=document+format&amp;sa=Search&amp;cof=LH%3A25%3BCX%3ARedMonk%2520Related%3BFORID%3A1%3BS%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.redmonk.com%3BL%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.redmonk.com%2Fimages%2Flogo_banner.gif%3BLP%3A1&amp;hl=en&amp;client=ca-pub-9023901255191857&amp;channel=5651410214\">all the document format wars<\/a> out there? How can an &#8220;enterprise&#8221; transition from emailing around Word docs and PDFs to using web sites like Share and SharePoint?<\/li>\n<li>Make toy applications on the platform of the <i>du jour<\/i> that integrate with Share &#8211; make something in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ning.com\">Ning<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/redmonk.com\/sogrady\/2008\/04\/09\/clouds-rolling-in-the-google-app-engine-qa\/\">GAE<\/a>, whatever <a href=\"http:\/\/bungeeconnect.wordpress.com\/2008\/02\/18\/defining-platform-as-a-service-or-paas\/\">PaaS<\/a> bucket shows up on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techmeme.com\/\">Techmeme<\/a>, integrate with it. Yes, this is just cheap, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Page_view\">page view<\/a>-think, <i>absolutely<\/i>.<\/li>\n<li>Start using Share for Adobe&#8217;s correspondences &#8211; I got an invite to this year&#8217;s Adobe Analyst event (thanks! lookin&#8217; forward to it!). That would have been the perfect chance to slap in a URL for a brochure that went to Share. Engage and invites for the OnAir bus tours too, if they don&#8217;t have it already. This a key point that many elder companies don&#8217;t get: new, SaaS, Whizbang 2.0 companies are always referring to themselves and doing mad link-bakcs. Large companies are terrible at promoting each others brand (they often don&#8217;t benefit compensation wise from it).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>The Slow Trickle Sweet-spot<\/h2>\n<p>As I say, despite my need to maintain a professional distance from fanboy-ery, I usually like stuff Adobe does, like Share, quite a bit (how&#8217;s that for a disclaimer?). As with most elder companies moving into a web or SaaS world, the execution of the Share road-map has the trappings of traditional software road-maps and marketing. Instead, to finally get those features I want to use in Share &#8211; using it for a RedMonk library, making it easy to throw up a PDF on my blog &#8211; Adobe needs to find that balance of speeding up to deliver tiny features more frequently.<\/p>\n<h2>It&#8217;s Generalizable<\/h2>\n<p>As usual, while I might be using Share as a specific example here, you can pretty much do a search-and-replace on &#8220;Share&#8221; for your product name and the same advice will probably apply. You&#8217;ve gotta be out there, in user&#8217;s face all the time. SaaS killed the packaged software star.<\/p>\n<p><b>Disclaimer:<\/b> Adobe is a client, as is Microsoft.<\/p>\n<p><!-- technorati tags start --><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:right;font-size:10px\">Technorati Tags: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/tag\/adobe\" rel=\"tag\">adobe<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/tag\/share\" rel=\"tag\">share<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/tag\/openid\" rel=\"tag\">openid<\/a><\/p>\n<p><!-- technorati tags end --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Using Adobe Share as an example of a SaaS that&#8217;s not releasing small features fast enough.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,13,17,33,36],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1304","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-companies","category-ideas","category-marketing","category-social-software","category-the-new-thing"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/cote\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1304","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/cote\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/cote\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/cote\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/cote\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1304"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/cote\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1304\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/cote\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1304"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/cote\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1304"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redmonk.com\/cote\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}