Comments on: Beyond Cassandra: Facebook, Twitter and the Future of Development

By: Why There Won’t Be a LAMP For Big Data – tecosystems

Why There Won’t Be a LAMP For Big Data – tecosystems — Sun, 03 Oct 2010 01:15:25 +0000

[...] you look at web properties such as Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter, this is evident [coverage]. Portions of their Big Data workload are serviced by Hadoop implementations, while others are [...]

By: Algunos apuntes sobre NoSql - maxilovera.com.ar

Algunos apuntes sobre NoSql - maxilovera.com.ar — Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:29:31 +0000

[...] Facebook y Twitter, la adopción de Cassandra. [...]

By: NoSQL Resources « Angel “Java” Lopez on Blog

NoSQL Resources « Angel “Java” Lopez on Blog — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:01:50 +0000

[...] Tutorial: Getting started with Cassandra NoSQL in Twitter Twitter, Facebook and Cassandra, and Open Source Cassandra and Twitter: interview with Ryan King (Twitter is reviewing if they use or not [...]

By: Resultado de ALT.NET Hispano VAN sobre NoSQL - Angel "Java" Lopez

Resultado de ALT.NET Hispano VAN sobre NoSQL - Angel "Java" Lopez — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 16:25:07 +0000

[...] Tutorial: Getting started with Cassandra NoSQL in Twitter Twitter, Facebook and Cassandra, and Open Source Cassandra and Twitter: interview with Ryan King (Twitter está reviendo si usa NoSQL o [...]

By: tecosystems » Frictionless Computing: What it Means for Infrastructure

tecosystems » Frictionless Computing: What it Means for Infrastructure — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:35:20 +0000

[...] and Twitter are increasingly leveraging open source as a primary, mainstream development path (coverage) – spiking the volume of available code – and there has never been a better time to be [...]

By: tecosystems » Open Core is the New Dual Licensing

tecosystems » Open Core is the New Dual Licensing — Thu, 01 Jul 2010 02:56:07 +0000

[...] Pure play open source software is today, and always has been, more popular. Which is why I categorically reject arguments that assert that open core-style mechanisms are necessary for the production of open source software. That they are beneficial from a revenue standpoint to organizations built to monetize open source software is indisputable; but open source is, of course, not strictly or even primarily authored for purposes of sale (coverage). [...]

By: Algunos apuntes sobre NoSql

Algunos apuntes sobre NoSql — Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:02:42 +0000

[...] Facebook y Twitter, la adopción de Cassandra. [...]

By: tecosystems » The Economics of Open Source: Why the Billion Dollar Barrier is Irrelevant

Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:27:16 +0000

[...] clear that open source as a development model for non-differentiating software is gaining steam (coverage). The trend is most obvious in web native players collaboratively developing their infrastructure [...]

By: Ned Wolpert

Ned Wolpert — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:02:17 +0000

I was wondering about the updated note saying the Facebook does not use Cassandra anymore. Does that mean that they don’t use what they originally built at any level, or only that they don’t have anything to do with the Apache Cassandra project but still use their internally developed one at Facebook. I’d like to know what the reason Facebook had for not using Cassandra anymore.

By: When you should open-source your internal apps | Florida, Technology Information, Reviews, News, Software Downloads and More

Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:19:14 +0000

[...] IT departments should revisit their application development strategies to follow some of the approaches used by Facebook and Twitter, argues RedMonk analyst Stephen [...]