Comments on: Forking, The Future of Open Source, and Github http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/04/01/github/ because technology is just another ecosystem Sun, 13 May 2012 00:23:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: A Few More Details On Why We Switched To GitHub | Basho http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/04/01/github/comment-page-1/#comment-712240 A Few More Details On Why We Switched To GitHub | Basho Mon, 12 Sep 2011 05:06:29 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3593#comment-712240 [...] development platform there is (at least one well-respected software analyst has even called it “the future of open source”). Though Mercurial was deeply ingrained in our development process, we were willing to tolerate the [...] [...] development platform there is (at least one well-respected software analyst has even called it “the future of open source”). Though Mercurial was deeply ingrained in our development process, we were willing to tolerate the [...]

]]> By: Quora http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/04/01/github/comment-page-1/#comment-708966 Quora Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:47:30 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3593#comment-708966 <strong>How has Github accelerated the tempo of software innovation?...</strong> "[At] the kind invitation of the folks from Eclipse, I had the opportunity to sit with more august company – Justin Erenkrantz (Apache), Mårten Mickos (Eucalyptus), and Jason van Zyl (Maven/Sonatype) – on a panel charged with debating the future of op... How has Github accelerated the tempo of software innovation?…

“[At] the kind invitation of the folks from Eclipse, I had the opportunity to sit with more august company – Justin Erenkrantz (Apache), Mårten Mickos (Eucalyptus), and Jason van Zyl (Maven/Sonatype) – on a panel charged with debating the future of op…

]]> By: tecosystems » Beyond Cassandra: Facebook, Twitter and the Future of Development http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/04/01/github/comment-page-1/#comment-628702 tecosystems » Beyond Cassandra: Facebook, Twitter and the Future of Development Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:25:18 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3593#comment-628702 [...] be the notable exception (possibly bc it came from FriendFeed). Some assets are hosted with Github (coverage), those that are not are typically housed at [...] [...] be the notable exception (possibly bc it came from FriendFeed). Some assets are hosted with Github (coverage), those that are not are typically housed at [...]

]]> By: Producing Open Source Software « Shaun Kime's Blog http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/04/01/github/comment-page-1/#comment-619546 Producing Open Source Software « Shaun Kime's Blog Tue, 11 May 2010 20:31:10 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3593#comment-619546 [...] about forking when revision control packages like Git and Mercurial exist. Here’s an article that references these types of differences and why forking may not be such a big deal [...] [...] about forking when revision control packages like Git and Mercurial exist. Here’s an article that references these types of differences and why forking may not be such a big deal [...]

]]> By: tecosystems » The Future of Open Data Looks Like…Github? http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/04/01/github/comment-page-1/#comment-618634 tecosystems » The Future of Open Data Looks Like…Github? Tue, 04 May 2010 15:06:50 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3593#comment-618634 [...] version control infrastructures such as Launchpad or, yes, Gitorius, actively encourage forking (coverage). They do so primarily by minimizing the logistical implications of creating and maintaining [...] [...] version control infrastructures such as Launchpad or, yes, Gitorius, actively encourage forking (coverage). They do so primarily by minimizing the logistical implications of creating and maintaining [...]

]]> By: Stephen O’Grady: Cassandra and The Enterprise Tension | Weez.com http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/04/01/github/comment-page-1/#comment-618109 Stephen O’Grady: Cassandra and The Enterprise Tension | Weez.com Sun, 02 May 2010 20:10:36 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3593#comment-618109 [...] (by one group) feature will be minimal, decline to add it, or maintain a fork. With the latter less logistically expensive these days, perhaps that will become more viable an approach – even in commercial [...] [...] (by one group) feature will be minimal, decline to add it, or maintain a fork. With the latter less logistically expensive these days, perhaps that will become more viable an approach – even in commercial [...]

]]> By: tecosystems » Cassandra and The Enterprise Tension http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/04/01/github/comment-page-1/#comment-616516 tecosystems » Cassandra and The Enterprise Tension Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:42:40 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3593#comment-616516 [...] (by one group) feature will be minimal, decline to add it, or maintain a fork. With the latter less logistically expensive these days, perhaps that will become more viable an approach – even in commercial [...] [...] (by one group) feature will be minimal, decline to add it, or maintain a fork. With the latter less logistically expensive these days, perhaps that will become more viable an approach – even in commercial [...]

]]> By: Destillat #37 – FOSS, FLOSS, Open Source | duetsch.info - Open Source, Wet-, Web-, Software http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/04/01/github/comment-page-1/#comment-615902 Destillat #37 – FOSS, FLOSS, Open Source | duetsch.info - Open Source, Wet-, Web-, Software Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:37:49 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3593#comment-615902 [...] Forking, The Future of Open Source, and Github [...] [...] Forking, The Future of Open Source, and Github [...]

]]> By: Ian Skerrett http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/04/01/github/comment-page-1/#comment-609259 Ian Skerrett Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:14:55 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3593#comment-609259 Stephen, Insightful post, as always. Balancing the needs of a 'single source' with a more distributed collaboration environment is something a lot of people will struggle with over the next couple of years. fyi, here is some insight on how the Eclipse community is implementing git: http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/eclipsewebmaster/2010/04/01/git-vs-ip-provenance-dvcs-with-a-twist/ Ian Stephen,

Insightful post, as always. Balancing the needs of a ‘single source’ with a more distributed collaboration environment is something a lot of people will struggle with over the next couple of years. fyi, here is some insight on how the Eclipse community is implementing git: http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/eclipsewebmaster/2010/04/01/git-vs-ip-provenance-dvcs-with-a-twist/

Ian

]]> By: Links 5/4/2010: GNOME 3 Mockups, KDE 4.4.2 in Mandriva 2010 | Techrights http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/04/01/github/comment-page-1/#comment-608856 Links 5/4/2010: GNOME 3 Mockups, KDE 4.4.2 in Mandriva 2010 | Techrights Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:54:34 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3593#comment-608856 [...] Forking, The Future of Open Source, and Github Last Wednesday, at the kind invitation of the folks from Eclipse, I had the opportunity to sit with more august company – Justin Erenkrantz (Apache), Mårten Mickos (Eucalyptus), and Jason van Zyl (Maven/Sonatype) – on a panel charged with debating the future of open source. Among the questions posed to us was this: is the future of open source going to be based on communities such as Apache and Eclipse or will it be based on companies that sell open source? [...] [...] Forking, The Future of Open Source, and Github Last Wednesday, at the kind invitation of the folks from Eclipse, I had the opportunity to sit with more august company – Justin Erenkrantz (Apache), Mårten Mickos (Eucalyptus), and Jason van Zyl (Maven/Sonatype) – on a panel charged with debating the future of open source. Among the questions posed to us was this: is the future of open source going to be based on communities such as Apache and Eclipse or will it be based on companies that sell open source? [...]

]]>