<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunset: The Oracle Acquisition Q&amp;A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/01/28/oracle-acquisition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/01/28/oracle-acquisition/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coté&#39;s People Over Process &#187; On Sun Folks Leaving Oracle</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/01/28/oracle-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-621173</link>
		<dc:creator>Coté&#39;s People Over Process &#187; On Sun Folks Leaving Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 16:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3389#comment-621173</guid>
		<description>[...] be sure to check out RedMonk&#8217;s coverage of Oracle gobbling up Oracle: from me, from Stephen, and from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be sure to check out RedMonk&#8217;s coverage of Oracle gobbling up Oracle: from me, from Stephen, and from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidHalko</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/01/28/oracle-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-617273</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidHalko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3389#comment-617273</guid>
		<description>&quot;It will be, as Oracle phrased it, a reference implementation. Beyond that, Oracle didn’t have much in the way of promises.&quot;

The presentation from Oracle directly contradicted this viewpoint. The expansion of GlasssFish was explained in a substantial multi-year detailed plan.

http://www.slideshare.net/pelegri/community-update-25-mar2010-english</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It will be, as Oracle phrased it, a reference implementation. Beyond that, Oracle didn’t have much in the way of promises.&#8221;</p>
<p>The presentation from Oracle directly contradicted this viewpoint. The expansion of GlasssFish was explained in a substantial multi-year detailed plan.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/pelegri/community-update-25-mar2010-english" >http://www.slideshare.net/pelegri/community-update-25-mar2010-english</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just another Oracle Sunrise, Or, A Consolidation Sketch</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/01/28/oracle-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-594369</link>
		<dc:creator>Just another Oracle Sunrise, Or, A Consolidation Sketch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3389#comment-594369</guid>
		<description>[...] else seems to have gone with the Sunset, so I figured why not call out Sunrise instead… while some Sun technology is going to get nuked, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] else seems to have gone with the Sunset, so I figured why not call out Sunrise instead… while some Sun technology is going to get nuked, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor&#39;s Monkchips &#187; Just another Oracle Sunrise: Further Thoughts on Consolidation</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/01/28/oracle-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-594367</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor&#39;s Monkchips &#187; Just another Oracle Sunrise: Further Thoughts on Consolidation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3389#comment-594367</guid>
		<description>[...] else seems to have gone with the Sunset, so I figured why not call out Sunrise instead&#8230; while some Sun technology is going to get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] else seems to have gone with the Sunset, so I figured why not call out Sunrise instead&#8230; while some Sun technology is going to get [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle Sun Merger Closes &#171; Jeremy&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/01/28/oracle-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-590488</link>
		<dc:creator>Oracle Sun Merger Closes &#171; Jeremy&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3389#comment-590488</guid>
		<description>[...] Shortly after the deal closed, Oracle had a five hour webcast discussing Oracle&#8217;s plans. As Stephen O&#8217;Grady notes, &#8220;Between Ellison, Kurian, Phillips and the rest, we got our share of answers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shortly after the deal closed, Oracle had a five hour webcast discussing Oracle&#8217;s plans. As Stephen O&#8217;Grady notes, &#8220;Between Ellison, Kurian, Phillips and the rest, we got our share of answers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle + Sun &#171; WillyXoft</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/01/28/oracle-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-590361</link>
		<dc:creator>Oracle + Sun &#171; WillyXoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3389#comment-590361</guid>
		<description>[...] &amp; Stephen (Redmonk), Savio Rodrigues (IBM/Geronimo) and Mark Little [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &amp; Stephen (Redmonk), Savio Rodrigues (IBM/Geronimo) and Mark Little [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enterpriseGeeks &#187; Enterprise Geeks Podcast &#8211; Team Players</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/01/28/oracle-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-590145</link>
		<dc:creator>enterpriseGeeks &#187; Enterprise Geeks Podcast &#8211; Team Players</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3389#comment-590145</guid>
		<description>[...] Sunset: The Oracle Acquisition Q&amp;A &#8211; by Stephen O&#8217;Grady [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sunset: The Oracle Acquisition Q&amp;A &#8211; by Stephen O&#8217;Grady [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 29/1/2010: Many New Releases of GNU/Linux, Oracle Makes Promises &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/01/28/oracle-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-589846</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 29/1/2010: Many New Releases of GNU/Linux, Oracle Makes Promises &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3389#comment-589846</guid>
		<description>[...] Sunset: The Oracle Acquisition Q&amp;A If yesterday’s epic five hour webcast discussing Oracle’s plans for its finally acquired Sun assets was a long time coming for the analysts listening in, you can imagine how much of a wait it’s been for those on both sides of the transaction. It’s been roughly nine months, remember, since the database giant announced its intention to acquire the one time dot com darling. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sunset: The Oracle Acquisition Q&amp;A If yesterday’s epic five hour webcast discussing Oracle’s plans for its finally acquired Sun assets was a long time coming for the analysts listening in, you can imagine how much of a wait it’s been for those on both sides of the transaction. It’s been roughly nine months, remember, since the database giant announced its intention to acquire the one time dot com darling. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coté&#39;s People Over Process &#187; Links for January 27th through January 29th</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/01/28/oracle-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-589839</link>
		<dc:creator>Coté&#39;s People Over Process &#187; Links for January 27th through January 29th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3389#comment-589839</guid>
		<description>[...] been a lot of follow-on from the Oracle+Sun event earlier this week. Stephen has a nice Q&amp;A up on it now, and you may recall my quick analysis on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been a lot of follow-on from the Oracle+Sun event earlier this week. Stephen has a nice Q&amp;A up on it now, and you may recall my quick analysis on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedMonk analyst Stephen O&#8217;Grady&#8217;s take on Oracle-Sun&#8217;s x86 future - Server Farming</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/01/28/oracle-acquisition/comment-page-1/#comment-589826</link>
		<dc:creator>RedMonk analyst Stephen O&#8217;Grady&#8217;s take on Oracle-Sun&#8217;s x86 future - Server Farming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3389#comment-589826</guid>
		<description>[...] to RedMonk analyst Stephen O&#8217;Grady&#8217;s blog, in response to a Twitter question about Oracle-Sun&#8217;s plans for x86: A: This is one of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to RedMonk analyst Stephen O&#8217;Grady&#8217;s blog, in response to a Twitter question about Oracle-Sun&#8217;s plans for x86: A: This is one of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 373/375 objects using xcache

Served from: redmonk.com @ 2012-02-13 02:54:48 -->
