<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s After Excel? Big Data and the Future of Spreadsheets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/11/19/whats-after-excel-big-data-and-the-future-of-spreadsheets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/11/19/whats-after-excel-big-data-and-the-future-of-spreadsheets/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coté&#39;s People Over Process &#187; Everything but cloud at Microsoft TechEd 2010</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/11/19/whats-after-excel-big-data-and-the-future-of-spreadsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-624977</link>
		<dc:creator>Coté&#39;s People Over Process &#187; Everything but cloud at Microsoft TechEd 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 01:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3174#comment-624977</guid>
		<description>[...] actually. RedMonk&#8217;s Stephen O&#8217;Grady regularly writes up Big Data topics (e.g., coverage on big data and the future of spreasheets) and we all spend a lot of time thinking about this kind of BI for the masses stuff. Crossed with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] actually. RedMonk&#8217;s Stephen O&#8217;Grady regularly writes up Big Data topics (e.g., coverage on big data and the future of spreasheets) and we all spend a lot of time thinking about this kind of BI for the masses stuff. Crossed with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; Big Data, Big Sheets, and Hadoop: Interviews with IBM&#8217;s Rod Smith</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/11/19/whats-after-excel-big-data-and-the-future-of-spreadsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-604192</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; Big Data, Big Sheets, and Hadoop: Interviews with IBM&#8217;s Rod Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3174#comment-604192</guid>
		<description>[...] which was why we wanted to get him on camera. Given that I&#8217;ve been following his Big Sheets application with interest since Hadoopworld, we were pleased to be able to catch up with him for a couple of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which was why we wanted to get him on camera. Given that I&#8217;ve been following his Big Sheets application with interest since Hadoopworld, we were pleased to be able to catch up with him for a couple of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amir Netz</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/11/19/whats-after-excel-big-data-and-the-future-of-spreadsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-576528</link>
		<dc:creator>Amir Netz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3174#comment-576528</guid>
		<description>Well... Microsoft moved the bar again: In Office 2010 Excel will be able to manage and analyze 100+ million rows in memory in blinding spead. All on the desktop with no need for Hadoop clusters.

Search for PowerPivot for more info. Some cool videos are available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; Microsoft moved the bar again: In Office 2010 Excel will be able to manage and analyze 100+ million rows in memory in blinding spead. All on the desktop with no need for Hadoop clusters.</p>
<p>Search for PowerPivot for more info. Some cool videos are available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/11/19/whats-after-excel-big-data-and-the-future-of-spreadsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-576400</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3174#comment-576400</guid>
		<description>With PowerPivots and Excel, now I can do in memory BI on top of DW directly, 10, 20m+ rows of data.  how big do i need now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With PowerPivots and Excel, now I can do in memory BI on top of DW directly, 10, 20m+ rows of data.  how big do i need now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niraj</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/11/19/whats-after-excel-big-data-and-the-future-of-spreadsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-575834</link>
		<dc:creator>Niraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3174#comment-575834</guid>
		<description>Feels great to see a post that amplifies my viewpoint here http://blog.gandalf-lab.com/2009/03/how-many-computers-does-world-need.html

IMHO - Just as Excel skills are must have for an MBA program today, Some  form of Mahout and Hadoop skills will be must have in future MBA programs. Using Collaborative Filters , Bayesian filter etc on large company datasets will be daily jobs for Managers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feels great to see a post that amplifies my viewpoint here <a href="http://blog.gandalf-lab.com/2009/03/how-many-computers-does-world-need.html" >http://blog.gandalf-lab.com/2009/03/how-many-computers-does-world-need.html</a></p>
<p>IMHO &#8211; Just as Excel skills are must have for an MBA program today, Some  form of Mahout and Hadoop skills will be must have in future MBA programs. Using Collaborative Filters , Bayesian filter etc on large company datasets will be daily jobs for Managers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Eifrem</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/11/19/whats-after-excel-big-data-and-the-future-of-spreadsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-575708</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Eifrem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3174#comment-575708</guid>
		<description>I agree that big data is a noble and important goal. And while the backend tools for handling big data is progressing nicely, it seems like very little work is being done on the frontend toolchain.

But *complex* data -- i.e. data that is intertwined, semi-structured, highly connected, irregular -- is probably even more relevant for the majority of the people out there. A lot of folks run into problems with joins (due to graph-shaped data) and sparse tables (due to semi-structured data) long before their data sets are even moderately large by Hadoop standards.

And a concern for me right now is that in the whole #nosql jungle, most focus on scaling to size and very few on scaling to complexity. That is unfortunate since I think coping with complexity is the more relevant problem for a larger slice of the population. But I&#039;m biased. :)

Anyway, I ranted a bit more about this here:

   http://blogs.neotechnology.com/emil/2009/11/nosql-scaling-to-size-and-scaling-to-complexity.html

Would love to hear your feedback!

-EE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that big data is a noble and important goal. And while the backend tools for handling big data is progressing nicely, it seems like very little work is being done on the frontend toolchain.</p>
<p>But *complex* data &#8212; i.e. data that is intertwined, semi-structured, highly connected, irregular &#8212; is probably even more relevant for the majority of the people out there. A lot of folks run into problems with joins (due to graph-shaped data) and sparse tables (due to semi-structured data) long before their data sets are even moderately large by Hadoop standards.</p>
<p>And a concern for me right now is that in the whole #nosql jungle, most focus on scaling to size and very few on scaling to complexity. That is unfortunate since I think coping with complexity is the more relevant problem for a larger slice of the population. But I&#8217;m biased. <img src='http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, I ranted a bit more about this here:</p>
<p>   <a href="http://blogs.neotechnology.com/emil/2009/11/nosql-scaling-to-size-and-scaling-to-complexity.html" >http://blogs.neotechnology.com/emil/2009/11/nosql-scaling-to-size-and-scaling-to-complexity.html</a></p>
<p>Would love to hear your feedback!</p>
<p>-EE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 309/311 objects using xcache

Served from: redmonk.com @ 2012-02-14 08:47:43 -->
