<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oracle, MySQL and the EU: The Q&amp;A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/10/23/oracle-mysql-and-the-eu-the-qa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/10/23/oracle-mysql-and-the-eu-the-qa/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; Data vs Dual Licensing: Which Will Make More Money?</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/10/23/oracle-mysql-and-the-eu-the-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-596318</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; Data vs Dual Licensing: Which Will Make More Money?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3049#comment-596318</guid>
		<description>[...] long the standard bearer for the approach, the logistics of dual licensing were and are becoming increasingly problematic over time: For smaller firms, the primary limitation [of dual licensing] is the development. Unlike [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] long the standard bearer for the approach, the logistics of dual licensing were and are becoming increasingly problematic over time: For smaller firms, the primary limitation [of dual licensing] is the development. Unlike [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; tecosystems 2009: What You Read, How You Read It, and Where You Read it From</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/10/23/oracle-mysql-and-the-eu-the-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-584783</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; tecosystems 2009: What You Read, How You Read It, and Where You Read it From</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3049#comment-584783</guid>
		<description>[...] Oracle, MySQL and the EU: The Q&amp;A (9.6) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oracle, MySQL and the EU: The Q&amp;A (9.6) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source Innovation Needs An MySQL Database Backbone &#124; DevWebPro</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/10/23/oracle-mysql-and-the-eu-the-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-582088</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Innovation Needs An MySQL Database Backbone &#124; DevWebPro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3049#comment-582088</guid>
		<description>[...] exist, but I can hardly buy the idea of MySQL being a credible challenger for Oracle, and I am&#160;not alone. Beyond any consideration about viable and sustainable business strategies involving GPL code, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exist, but I can hardly buy the idea of MySQL being a credible challenger for Oracle, and I am&nbsp;not alone. Beyond any consideration about viable and sustainable business strategies involving GPL code, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; Oracle, MySQL and the EU: The Endgame Q&#38;A</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/10/23/oracle-mysql-and-the-eu-the-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-580762</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; Oracle, MySQL and the EU: The Endgame Q&#38;A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3049#comment-580762</guid>
		<description>[...] You are on the record publicly as believing that the transaction should be allowed to proceed: do you still believe that? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You are on the record publicly as believing that the transaction should be allowed to proceed: do you still believe that? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let MySQL Go: Oracle, Open Source, and the EU</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/10/23/oracle-mysql-and-the-eu-the-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-574257</link>
		<dc:creator>Let MySQL Go: Oracle, Open Source, and the EU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3049#comment-574257</guid>
		<description>[...] Oracle, MySQL and the EU: The Q&amp;A (redmonk.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oracle, MySQL and the EU: The Q&amp;A (redmonk.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; Amazon, RDS and the Future of MySQL</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/10/23/oracle-mysql-and-the-eu-the-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-573196</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; Amazon, RDS and the Future of MySQL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3049#comment-573196</guid>
		<description>[...] relational database period. But with the project&#8217;s future open to question &#8211; the EU has stalled Oracle&#8217;s planned takeover of MySQL parent Sun &#8211; the timing is interesting. Amazon is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] relational database period. But with the project&#8217;s future open to question &#8211; the EU has stalled Oracle&#8217;s planned takeover of MySQL parent Sun &#8211; the timing is interesting. Amazon is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; Numbers, Volume 32</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/10/23/oracle-mysql-and-the-eu-the-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-572944</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; Numbers, Volume 32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3049#comment-572944</guid>
		<description>[...] the whole Oracle buying Sun scene. It has some notes on Oracles intentions with Java, MySQL (see Stephen&#8217;s recent opus), Glassfish, Netbeans, Solaris, and so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the whole Oracle buying Sun scene. It has some notes on Oracles intentions with Java, MySQL (see Stephen&#8217;s recent opus), Glassfish, Netbeans, Solaris, and so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chutzpah of the Week: Monty Widenius</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/10/23/oracle-mysql-and-the-eu-the-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-572876</link>
		<dc:creator>Chutzpah of the Week: Monty Widenius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3049#comment-572876</guid>
		<description>[...] Oracle, MySQL and the EU: The Q&amp;A (redmonk.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oracle, MySQL and the EU: The Q&amp;A (redmonk.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Mailhot</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/10/23/oracle-mysql-and-the-eu-the-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-571179</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Mailhot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3049#comment-571179</guid>
		<description>Of course Mysql and Oracle compete. Sure they both have their sweet spot, but do you really think Oracle never tried to push its db everywhere? One of Oracle&#039;s favourite  tricks is the Enterprise-wide as-much-as-you-can-deploy license, then come back a few years later and &#039;discover&#039; the volume deployed is much larger than was originally plannified (because corps do not like supporting diversity, so they&#039;ll push same-db everywhere if they can).

With mysql Oracle can not inflate its sales anymore, because customers can restrict their Oracle deployments to the apps that really need it (which is far less than people think)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Mysql and Oracle compete. Sure they both have their sweet spot, but do you really think Oracle never tried to push its db everywhere? One of Oracle&#8217;s favourite  tricks is the Enterprise-wide as-much-as-you-can-deploy license, then come back a few years later and &#8216;discover&#8217; the volume deployed is much larger than was originally plannified (because corps do not like supporting diversity, so they&#8217;ll push same-db everywhere if they can).</p>
<p>With mysql Oracle can not inflate its sales anymore, because customers can restrict their Oracle deployments to the apps that really need it (which is far less than people think)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory &#187; Everything you always wanted to know about MySQL but were afraid to ask</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/10/23/oracle-mysql-and-the-eu-the-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-571177</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory &#187; Everything you always wanted to know about MySQL but were afraid to ask</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=3049#comment-571177</guid>
		<description>[...] 23: Stephen O&#8217;Grady - Oracle, MySQL and the EU: The Q&amp;A &#8220;Given that Oracle has a negligible presence in the markets that Microsoft has been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 23: Stephen O&#8217;Grady &#8211; Oracle, MySQL and the EU: The Q&amp;A &#8220;Given that Oracle has a negligible presence in the markets that Microsoft has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
