<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging is Dead! Long Live Blogging!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/05/07/blogging-is-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/05/07/blogging-is-dead/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 00:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Integrity Research&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Does Twitter add value to corporate/investor communications?</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/05/07/blogging-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-546666</link>
		<dc:creator>Integrity Research&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Does Twitter add value to corporate/investor communications?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2783#comment-546666</guid>
		<description>[...] what about many-to-one communications? How does Twitter compare to traditional RSS readers, email alerts, data miners, and other tools for an individual analyst or PM to gather info from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what about many-to-one communications? How does Twitter compare to traditional RSS readers, email alerts, data miners, and other tools for an individual analyst or PM to gather info from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teressa Jimenez</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/05/07/blogging-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-546528</link>
		<dc:creator>Teressa Jimenez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 14:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2783#comment-546528</guid>
		<description>Thank you Steve.  Blogging can allow analysis, allow the author to take a stance and explain that stance.  A blog can invite discussion and thought.  Twitter feels more like a room of very young children - some have the ability to listen, but all want to be heard - at the same time!  The result?  More noise than dialog.  It&#039;s just not the same thing and one should not replace the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Steve.  Blogging can allow analysis, allow the author to take a stance and explain that stance.  A blog can invite discussion and thought.  Twitter feels more like a room of very young children &#8211; some have the ability to listen, but all want to be heard &#8211; at the same time!  The result?  More noise than dialog.  It&#8217;s just not the same thing and one should not replace the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave shields</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2009/05/07/blogging-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-546388</link>
		<dc:creator>dave shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2783#comment-546388</guid>
		<description>Twitter is cute. But unless you have *really* mastered Strunk and White&#039;s dictum to omit needless words, blogging will always trump Twitter.

Then again, based on evidence to date, if almost all twitterers took Strunk and White to heart, their twits would be of zero length.


thanks,dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is cute. But unless you have *really* mastered Strunk and White&#8217;s dictum to omit needless words, blogging will always trump Twitter.</p>
<p>Then again, based on evidence to date, if almost all twitterers took Strunk and White to heart, their twits would be of zero length.</p>
<p>thanks,dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 264/265 objects using xcache

Served from: redmonk.com @ 2012-05-26 14:24:41 -->
