<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Would SOG Do?: Views on Sun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/11/26/wwsd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/11/26/wwsd/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; Sunset: The Oracle Acquisition Q&#38;A</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/11/26/wwsd/comment-page-1/#comment-589657</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; Sunset: The Oracle Acquisition Q&#38;A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2534#comment-589657</guid>
		<description>[...] has traditionally made its money, could be a significant distraction? A: Absolutely. I&#8217;ve argued in the past that one of Sun&#8217;s issues was a lack of focus, and trying to do too much, in too many areas, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has traditionally made its money, could be a significant distraction? A: Absolutely. I&#8217;ve argued in the past that one of Sun&#8217;s issues was a lack of focus, and trying to do too much, in too many areas, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; The Oracle Predicts a Setting Sun</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/11/26/wwsd/comment-page-1/#comment-542877</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; The Oracle Predicts a Setting Sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2534#comment-542877</guid>
		<description>[...] the deprecession. But independent of that, certainly focus was a problem. We&#8217;ve recommended in the past that Sun decommit from underperforming assets that have either zero or a negative return, and it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the deprecession. But independent of that, certainly focus was a problem. We&#8217;ve recommended in the past that Sun decommit from underperforming assets that have either zero or a negative return, and it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; JavaFX 1.0 Arrives - What Now?</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/11/26/wwsd/comment-page-1/#comment-498295</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; JavaFX 1.0 Arrives - What Now?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2534#comment-498295</guid>
		<description>[...] that&#8217;s not Adobe, including Sun and Microsoft. But, it&#8217;s not too late. I&#8217;ll leave the portfolio analysis to Stephen&#8217;s comments on Sun, which I pretty much agree [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that&#8217;s not Adobe, including Sun and Microsoft. But, it&#8217;s not too late. I&#8217;ll leave the portfolio analysis to Stephen&#8217;s comments on Sun, which I pretty much agree [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; IT Management Podcast #27 - What type of cranberry person are you?</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/11/26/wwsd/comment-page-1/#comment-497348</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; IT Management Podcast #27 - What type of cranberry person are you?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2534#comment-497348</guid>
		<description>[...] topic of Sun, we do the favorite parlor game of playing &#8220;what will happen to Sun.&#8221; See Stephen O&#8217;Grady&#8217;s excellent write-up on that topic, as mentioned, as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] topic of Sun, we do the favorite parlor game of playing &#8220;what will happen to Sun.&#8221; See Stephen O&#8217;Grady&#8217;s excellent write-up on that topic, as mentioned, as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dog</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/11/26/wwsd/comment-page-1/#comment-497285</link>
		<dc:creator>dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2534#comment-497285</guid>
		<description>What about becoming the preeminent Java stack?

I&#039;ve seen companies like Azul that do so.. why doesn&#039;t  Sun have &quot;Java Mainframes&quot;? Highly tuned machines that will handle tons of transactions and require no upfront tuning.

They could do the same for PHP, Python and Ruby running on the same JVM.

Imagine a system that has all the software it needs so that you hand it a WAR and it runs any application you give it. But it can run up to thousands of simultaneous threads on the same VM.

Worried about security? Get your own &quot;cloud computer&quot; in a box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about becoming the preeminent Java stack?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen companies like Azul that do so.. why doesn&#8217;t  Sun have &#8220;Java Mainframes&#8221;? Highly tuned machines that will handle tons of transactions and require no upfront tuning.</p>
<p>They could do the same for PHP, Python and Ruby running on the same JVM.</p>
<p>Imagine a system that has all the software it needs so that you hand it a WAR and it runs any application you give it. But it can run up to thousands of simultaneous threads on the same VM.</p>
<p>Worried about security? Get your own &#8220;cloud computer&#8221; in a box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Clark</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/11/26/wwsd/comment-page-1/#comment-496836</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2534#comment-496836</guid>
		<description>Many good comments here, but I think your take on NetBeans misses the mark.  NetBeans has evolved into an excellent tool that acts as a &quot;gateway drug&quot; to Sun&#039;s other offerings.  It certainly worked that way in my case, leading me to re-engage with Java and eventually investigate Solaris and Sun&#039;s hardware offerings which were completely off my radar previously.  Good developer tools are important to Sun&#039;s business and I don&#039;t think the open source community on its own can provide them.  I don&#039;t see the same fit with OpenOffice, as much as I like and use the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many good comments here, but I think your take on NetBeans misses the mark.  NetBeans has evolved into an excellent tool that acts as a &#8220;gateway drug&#8221; to Sun&#8217;s other offerings.  It certainly worked that way in my case, leading me to re-engage with Java and eventually investigate Solaris and Sun&#8217;s hardware offerings which were completely off my radar previously.  Good developer tools are important to Sun&#8217;s business and I don&#8217;t think the open source community on its own can provide them.  I don&#8217;t see the same fit with OpenOffice, as much as I like and use the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory &#187; 451 CAOS Links 2008.11.28</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/11/26/wwsd/comment-page-1/#comment-496286</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory &#187; 451 CAOS Links 2008.11.28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2534#comment-496286</guid>
		<description>[...] What Would SOG Do?: Views on Sun Stephen O&#8217;Grady, RedMonk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What Would SOG Do?: Views on Sun Stephen O&#8217;Grady, RedMonk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Guo</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/11/26/wwsd/comment-page-1/#comment-496172</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Guo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2534#comment-496172</guid>
		<description>As someone with 20+ years of software engineering experience, allow me to offer another way of looking at Java&#039;s relevancy to Sun.

Java is a language and platform. Without languages, no software can be built. Whether Sun makes money from Java is not the point here. Java is a necessary technology to differentiate Sun&#039;s other technologies like Solaris and Glassfish because Java is a first-class citizen on them.

Here are other examples of language/platform technologies that do not make money: 
1. Objective-C from Apple - required to write OSX and iPhone applications.
2. .NET from Microsoft - suite of languages for next-generation apps for Windows.
3. DirectX from Microsoft - used by virtually all PC-based and XBox games.
4. ActionScript/Flex from Adobe - Flex SDK is free but the tool/IDE is not.

I think the examples above are enough for all to see a pattern here. This is why Java is necessary for Sun, whether or not it makes money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone with 20+ years of software engineering experience, allow me to offer another way of looking at Java&#8217;s relevancy to Sun.</p>
<p>Java is a language and platform. Without languages, no software can be built. Whether Sun makes money from Java is not the point here. Java is a necessary technology to differentiate Sun&#8217;s other technologies like Solaris and Glassfish because Java is a first-class citizen on them.</p>
<p>Here are other examples of language/platform technologies that do not make money:<br />
1. Objective-C from Apple &#8211; required to write OSX and iPhone applications.<br />
2. .NET from Microsoft &#8211; suite of languages for next-generation apps for Windows.<br />
3. DirectX from Microsoft &#8211; used by virtually all PC-based and XBox games.<br />
4. ActionScript/Flex from Adobe &#8211; Flex SDK is free but the tool/IDE is not.</p>
<p>I think the examples above are enough for all to see a pattern here. This is why Java is necessary for Sun, whether or not it makes money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Sands</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/11/26/wwsd/comment-page-1/#comment-495866</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Sands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2534#comment-495866</guid>
		<description>Stephen: I think you&#039;re right on that Sun&#039;s problem is that it is technology-driven. Technology-driven isn&#039;t all bad, but now isn&#039;t the time for it. That probably means the Sun we know probably can&#039;t survive as we know it. My thoughts are at http://rich-sands.com/wordpress/?p=33</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen: I think you&#8217;re right on that Sun&#8217;s problem is that it is technology-driven. Technology-driven isn&#8217;t all bad, but now isn&#8217;t the time for it. That probably means the Sun we know probably can&#8217;t survive as we know it. My thoughts are at <a href="http://rich-sands.com/wordpress/?p=33" >http://rich-sands.com/wordpress/?p=33</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stratocaster &#183; What Should Sun Do?</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/11/26/wwsd/comment-page-1/#comment-495864</link>
		<dc:creator>Stratocaster &#183; What Should Sun Do?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2534#comment-495864</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m piling on too, with a somewhat different take than Tim Bray, Stephen O&#8217;Grady, James Governor, and Rich Sharples who&#8217;ve all contributed their excellent insights into this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m piling on too, with a somewhat different take than Tim Bray, Stephen O&#8217;Grady, James Governor, and Rich Sharples who&#8217;ve all contributed their excellent insights into this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 373/375 objects using xcache

Served from: redmonk.com @ 2012-02-11 21:39:41 -->
