<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Organic vs Inorganic: Whatever Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/07/28/organicvsinorganic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/07/28/organicvsinorganic/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; Drizzle: Ahead of the Storm</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/07/28/organicvsinorganic/comment-page-1/#comment-483107</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; Drizzle: Ahead of the Storm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2125#comment-483107</guid>
		<description>[...] assumptions and architecture is the potential malleability of the project. While sitting on a panel with him at OSCON this past July, Brian previewed some of his thinking on forking committed to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] assumptions and architecture is the potential malleability of the project. While sitting on a panel with him at OSCON this past July, Brian previewed some of his thinking on forking committed to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevWebPro &#187; Post Topic &#187; Construct Your Business Model With Open Source</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/07/28/organicvsinorganic/comment-page-1/#comment-471278</link>
		<dc:creator>DevWebPro &#187; Post Topic &#187; Construct Your Business Model With Open Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2125#comment-471278</guid>
		<description>[...] are based on open source projects, either sponsored by your organization, third parties or “organic“. Your core competencies not only define your core value proposition, but they determine also [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are based on open source projects, either sponsored by your organization, third parties or “organic“. Your core competencies not only define your core value proposition, but they determine also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: About Mapping Open Source into Your Business Model &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/07/28/organicvsinorganic/comment-page-1/#comment-471258</link>
		<dc:creator>About Mapping Open Source into Your Business Model &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2125#comment-471258</guid>
		<description>[...] are based on open source projects, either sponsored by your organization, third parties or &#8220;organic&#8220;. Your core competencies not only define your core value proposition, but they determine also [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are based on open source projects, either sponsored by your organization, third parties or &#8220;organic&#8220;. Your core competencies not only define your core value proposition, but they determine also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Dixon</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/07/28/organicvsinorganic/comment-page-1/#comment-443663</link>
		<dc:creator>James Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2125#comment-443663</guid>
		<description>Well said Stephen.

Personally I prefer organic vs managed open source as the term 'inorganic' doesn't mean much to me in this context.

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Stephen.</p>
<p>Personally I prefer organic vs managed open source as the term &#8216;inorganic&#8217; doesn&#8217;t mean much to me in this context.</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory &#187; The apiarist&#8217;s dilemma</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/07/28/organicvsinorganic/comment-page-1/#comment-443310</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory &#187; The apiarist&#8217;s dilemma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/?p=2125#comment-443310</guid>
		<description>[...] I’m comfortable with inorganic projects and contributions: I (generally) trust the market,&#8221; he writes, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I’m comfortable with inorganic projects and contributions: I (generally) trust the market,&#8221; he writes, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
