<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where&#8217;s the Network?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/02/08/sun_network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/02/08/sun_network/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; What Would SOG Do?: Views on Sun</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/02/08/sun_network/#comment-495365</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; What Would SOG Do?: Views on Sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/02/08/sun_network/#comment-495365</guid>
		<description>[...] as I argued in February, I do not believe that Sun can afford to not be a player in the cloud market: Will said future, for example, include a computing landscape largely dominated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as I argued in February, I do not believe that Sun can afford to not be a player in the cloud market: Will said future, for example, include a computing landscape largely dominated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; Will There Be Only One Cloud?</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/02/08/sun_network/#comment-448847</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; Will There Be Only One Cloud?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/02/08/sun_network/#comment-448847</guid>
		<description>[...] no real secret that I&#8217;m bullish on the cloud opportunity. Very much so. See here, here, here, here, or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no real secret that I&#8217;m bullish on the cloud opportunity. Very much so. See here, here, here, here, or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; The Forecast: Cloudy Days Ahead</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/02/08/sun_network/#comment-353908</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; The Forecast: Cloudy Days Ahead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 02:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/02/08/sun_network/#comment-353908</guid>
		<description>[...] see cloud based offerings from some if not all of the major systems vendors, without question. As I wrote of Sun following their analyst conference, I don&#8217;t think they can afford not to play in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see cloud based offerings from some if not all of the major systems vendors, without question. As I wrote of Sun following their analyst conference, I don&#8217;t think they can afford not to play in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Illuminata Perspectives &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dell Does SaaS with MessageOne</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/02/08/sun_network/#comment-309159</link>
		<dc:creator>Illuminata Perspectives &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dell Does SaaS with MessageOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/02/08/sun_network/#comment-309159</guid>
		<description>[...] However, even if we don&#8217;t posit anything so extreme&#8212;at least for any reasonable planning horizon&#8212;it&#8217;s still reasonable to ask a question: &#8220;Shouldn&#8217;t system vendors be looking at ways to themselves deliver the software and services that users need over the network?&#8221; The alternative, it seems, is to cede considerable control to service providers who are as likely to build their own white boxes as to pay a premium for any Tier One vendor&#8217;s.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, even if we don&#8217;t posit anything so extreme&#8212;at least for any reasonable planning horizon&#8212;it&#8217;s still reasonable to ask a question: &#8220;Shouldn&#8217;t system vendors be looking at ways to themselves deliver the software and services that users need over the network?&#8221; The alternative, it seems, is to cede considerable control to service providers who are as likely to build their own white boxes as to pay a premium for any Tier One vendor&#8217;s&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; Strong Leaders, Strange Bedfellows and The Art of War by Sun 2</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/02/08/sun_network/#comment-304537</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; Strong Leaders, Strange Bedfellows and The Art of War by Sun 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/02/08/sun_network/#comment-304537</guid>
		<description>[...] expected a magnum opus from Stephen but it looks like I wrote the book this time.  Cote wonders whether shareholders will be prepared [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expected a magnum opus from Stephen but it looks like I wrote the book this time.  Cote wonders whether shareholders will be prepared [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
