<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-11-17</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/11/16/links-for-2007-11-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/11/16/links-for-2007-11-17/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Dolan</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/11/16/links-for-2007-11-17/comment-page-1/#comment-219130</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Dolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/11/16/links-for-2007-11-17/#comment-219130</guid>
		<description>I had a suspicion they were on this type of path... it's a very savvy move. Google applied some very insightful genius in devising the Android platform - I guess you can do that with the lineup of open source software rock stars they've brought on board. 

Now the true test is building a community around Android. If you apply an economic lens, it's obvious there are likely to be a few motivated firms to participate and leverage Android as a community - and it's unlikely that this license will be a barrier. It's obviously too early to call it a success or failure, but if you ask me, Google's Android appears well positioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a suspicion they were on this type of path&#8230; it&#8217;s a very savvy move. Google applied some very insightful genius in devising the Android platform - I guess you can do that with the lineup of open source software rock stars they&#8217;ve brought on board. </p>
<p>Now the true test is building a community around Android. If you apply an economic lens, it&#8217;s obvious there are likely to be a few motivated firms to participate and leverage Android as a community - and it&#8217;s unlikely that this license will be a barrier. It&#8217;s obviously too early to call it a success or failure, but if you ask me, Google&#8217;s Android appears well positioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing Harrison</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/11/16/links-for-2007-11-17/comment-page-1/#comment-217409</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/11/16/links-for-2007-11-17/#comment-217409</guid>
		<description>...so Google can't claim it's Java, and if I'm a developer I now have to choose between Davlik and Jme (or is it Jse)? Seems like they're dicking around with Sun, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;so Google can&#8217;t claim it&#8217;s Java, and if I&#8217;m a developer I now have to choose between Davlik and Jme (or is it Jse)? Seems like they&#8217;re dicking around with Sun, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
