<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An OpenSolaris by Any Other Name: The Q&amp;A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commercial Open Source Blog: one year in review &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/comment-page-1/#comment-371939</link>
		<dc:creator>Commercial Open Source Blog: one year in review &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/#comment-371939</guid>
		<description>[...] Monk&#8217;s folks, with their insights, unconferences and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Monk&#8217;s folks, with their insights, unconferences and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Open Source, Open Solaris, Mozilla: links 28-10-2007 &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/comment-page-1/#comment-371932</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Open Source, Open Solaris, Mozilla: links 28-10-2007 &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/#comment-371932</guid>
		<description>[...] An OpenSolaris by Any Other Name: The Q&amp;A - Great post by Sogrady, really interesting. By the way, I am wondering if RedMonk folks will give any soon its feedbacks on Open Source Franchising.. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An OpenSolaris by Any Other Name: The Q&#38;A &#8211; Great post by Sogrady, really interesting. By the way, I am wondering if RedMonk folks will give any soon its feedbacks on Open Source Franchising.. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Re: What Sun was trying to do with OpenSolaris &#171; this will be changed</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/comment-page-1/#comment-368053</link>
		<dc:creator>Re: What Sun was trying to do with OpenSolaris &#171; this will be changed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/#comment-368053</guid>
		<description>[...] An OpenSolaris by Any Other Name: The Q&amp;A [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An OpenSolaris by Any Other Name: The Q&amp;A [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somm Wunn</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/comment-page-1/#comment-321283</link>
		<dc:creator>Somm Wunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/#comment-321283</guid>
		<description>&gt; Consider the experience for someone who hears about “this open source Solaris thing.”

Look, there is no &quot;Linux&quot; to download; yet users have learnt, without marketing from any Linux vendor, that multiple Linux distros are a fact of life. I have come to learn for myself that I would have to download SXDE or Nexenta or Belenix should I want an OpenSolaris experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Consider the experience for someone who hears about “this open source Solaris thing.”</p>
<p>Look, there is no &#8220;Linux&#8221; to download; yet users have learnt, without marketing from any Linux vendor, that multiple Linux distros are a fact of life. I have come to learn for myself that I would have to download SXDE or Nexenta or Belenix should I want an OpenSolaris experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenSolaris trademark oder &#8230;es kann nur eine (Distro) geben? at Otmanix&#8217; Blog</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/comment-page-1/#comment-321133</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenSolaris trademark oder &#8230;es kann nur eine (Distro) geben? at Otmanix&#8217; Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/#comment-321133</guid>
		<description>[...] O&#8217;Grady fasste in seinem Blog hier und hier die zu kl&#228;renden Postion zwischen Sun und den Vertretern der OpenSolaris Community, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] O&#8217;Grady fasste in seinem Blog hier und hier die zu kl&#228;renden Postion zwischen Sun und den Vertretern der OpenSolaris Community, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life is so good, it gets better every day &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Post Indiana Developer Preview 2</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/comment-page-1/#comment-320794</link>
		<dc:creator>Life is so good, it gets better every day &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Post Indiana Developer Preview 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/#comment-320794</guid>
		<description>[...] two blog posts, here and here nail the issues for anyone who hasn&#8217;t caught up. It&#8217;s been a roller coaster [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two blog posts, here and here nail the issues for anyone who hasn&#8217;t caught up. It&#8217;s been a roller coaster [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; Linux vs OpenSolaris&#8230;Again: The Q&#38;A</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/comment-page-1/#comment-317858</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; Linux vs OpenSolaris&#8230;Again: The Q&#38;A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/#comment-317858</guid>
		<description>[...] the project termed Indiana - I&#8217;ve got excellent news for you: I&#8217;ve written them all up  here. Excellent for me, as well, because I don&#8217;t need to rehash it. Suffice it to say that the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the project termed Indiana &#8211; I&#8217;ve got excellent news for you: I&#8217;ve written them all up  here. Excellent for me, as well, because I don&#8217;t need to rehash it. Suffice it to say that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source Unleashed</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/comment-page-1/#comment-198622</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Unleashed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/#comment-198622</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;On the radar for 10/31/2007...&lt;/strong&gt;

The following are some of the announcements/blog posts/news items on my radar today, Wednesday October 31, 2007: Stephen O&#039;Grady&#039;s QA about OpenSolaris. I&#039;m particularly high on the links to the OpenSolaris Forum discussions, therein. There&#039;s somet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>On the radar for 10/31/2007&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The following are some of the announcements/blog posts/news items on my radar today, Wednesday October 31, 2007: Stephen O&#8217;Grady&#8217;s QA about OpenSolaris. I&#8217;m particularly high on the links to the OpenSolaris Forum discussions, therein. There&#8217;s somet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/comment-page-1/#comment-197051</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/#comment-197051</guid>
		<description>They should name it Solarian ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should name it Solarian <img src='http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: that&#8217;s whacked &#187; an OGB member&#8217;s dilemma</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/comment-page-1/#comment-196385</link>
		<dc:creator>that&#8217;s whacked &#187; an OGB member&#8217;s dilemma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/10/26/opensolaris_naming/#comment-196385</guid>
		<description>[...] O&#8217;grady has a good succinct summary along with his opinion on the matter. So here&#8217;s my dilemma. What is an OGB member&#8217;s duty? Is it to defend the interests of the community that&#8217;s grown up around OpenSolaris&#8230; or is it to grow the community more? The charter of the OGB which sets up this &#8220;federalised democracy&#8221; seems to set the powers of the OGB to be merely the appeals board for inter-Community conflicts. Which would imply that the responsibility of growing the community falls to the Advocacy Community&#8230; thus leaving the OGB to defend the interests of the community. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] O&#8217;grady has a good succinct summary along with his opinion on the matter. So here&#8217;s my dilemma. What is an OGB member&#8217;s duty? Is it to defend the interests of the community that&#8217;s grown up around OpenSolaris&#8230; or is it to grow the community more? The charter of the OGB which sets up this &#8220;federalised democracy&#8221; seems to set the powers of the OGB to be merely the appeals board for inter-Community conflicts. Which would imply that the responsibility of growing the community falls to the Advocacy Community&#8230; thus leaving the OGB to defend the interests of the community. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 377/379 objects using xcache

Served from: redmonk.com @ 2012-02-13 03:18:48 -->
