<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprising Ubuntu?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/07/30/ubuntu_enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/07/30/ubuntu_enterprise/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dave shields</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/07/30/ubuntu_enterprise/#comment-170540</link>
		<dc:creator>dave shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/07/30/ubuntu_enterprise/#comment-170540</guid>
		<description>Re apt-get, see &lt;a href="http://daveshields.wordpress.com/2007/09/22/dave-shields-on-package-management-apt-get-it-or-for-get-it/"&gt;Apt-Get It or For-get It&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re apt-get, see <a href="http://daveshields.wordpress.com/2007/09/22/dave-shields-on-package-management-apt-get-it-or-for-get-it/">Apt-Get It or For-get It</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Dolan</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/07/30/ubuntu_enterprise/#comment-137046</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Dolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/07/30/ubuntu_enterprise/#comment-137046</guid>
		<description>I think the LSB could be the answer. Not as it is today maybe, but in order to have multiple distros "work" in enterprise environments, you need some standardization. The proliferation of distros is fine for enthusiast users - but if you count the % of distros in datacenters, RHEL and SLES will own 99% share. RHEL and SLES also have strong commercial support groups today (RHEL had to ramp it up and imported someone big from Sun to do it well, SLES had to shift from Netware). Ubuntu may have trouble there, but it needs a good support arm for LTS. I have some ideas there... maybe I'll find them at LW and suggest it... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the LSB could be the answer. Not as it is today maybe, but in order to have multiple distros &#8220;work&#8221; in enterprise environments, you need some standardization. The proliferation of distros is fine for enthusiast users - but if you count the % of distros in datacenters, RHEL and SLES will own 99% share. RHEL and SLES also have strong commercial support groups today (RHEL had to ramp it up and imported someone big from Sun to do it well, SLES had to shift from Netware). Ubuntu may have trouble there, but it needs a good support arm for LTS. I have some ideas there&#8230; maybe I&#8217;ll find them at LW and suggest it&#8230; <img src='http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; IBM of Course *Does* Support Ubuntu</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/07/30/ubuntu_enterprise/#comment-135013</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; IBM of Course *Does* Support Ubuntu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/07/30/ubuntu_enterprise/#comment-135013</guid>
		<description>[...] and architects not so much. the RHEL lock remains hard to pick. Stephen&#8217;s thoughts from Ubuntu Live last week are here. I think we need to dig into the Ubuntu adoption question some more, to get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and architects not so much. the RHEL lock remains hard to pick. Stephen&#8217;s thoughts from Ubuntu Live last week are here. I think we need to dig into the Ubuntu adoption question some more, to get [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
