<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rational Wrapup: Two Days in Orlando</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparency in Software Development &#187; SDLC Blog</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/comment-page-1/#comment-378295</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparency in Software Development &#187; SDLC Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 22:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/#comment-378295</guid>
		<description>[...] discussions out there, mainly in the open source community (maybe, as Stephen O&#8217;Grady points out, it will be more accurate to characterize this as transparent development). In the case of the Jazz [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussions out there, mainly in the open source community (maybe, as Stephen O&#8217;Grady points out, it will be more accurate to characterize this as transparent development). In the case of the Jazz [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source Links: 11-07-2007 &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/comment-page-1/#comment-371931</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Links: 11-07-2007 &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/#comment-371931</guid>
		<description>[...] - Patrick Mueller, Senior Technical Staff member at IBM, talks about his experience with &#8220;transparency&#8221; over IBM&#8217;s product development [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Patrick Mueller, Senior Technical Staff member at IBM, talks about his experience with &#8220;transparency&#8221; over IBM&#8217;s product development [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; Open Source and IBM&#8217;s SOA-think - IBM Impact Day Two</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/comment-page-1/#comment-355489</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; Open Source and IBM&#8217;s SOA-think - IBM Impact Day Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/#comment-355489</guid>
		<description>[...] Rational Jazz project with it&#8217;s open commercial development schtick is going for pretty much all of that but without being fully open [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rational Jazz project with it&#8217;s open commercial development schtick is going for pretty much all of that but without being fully open [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comparing &#8220;open source&#8221; projects? Start by asking why does the project exist.</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/comment-page-1/#comment-238452</link>
		<dc:creator>Comparing &#8220;open source&#8221; projects? Start by asking why does the project exist.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/#comment-238452</guid>
		<description>[...] counter to what is expected. The same holds true for other companies as well, including IBM. Consider this Q&amp;A about commercial project expectations from Stephen O&#8217;Grady back in June: Q: Do you think that this Open Commercial Development represents an ideal hybrid of open source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] counter to what is expected. The same holds true for other companies as well, including IBM. Consider this Q&amp;A about commercial project expectations from Stephen O&#8217;Grady back in June: Q: Do you think that this Open Commercial Development represents an ideal hybrid of open source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-06-20 &#187; SDLC Blog</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/comment-page-1/#comment-107317</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-06-20 &#187; SDLC Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/#comment-107317</guid>
		<description>[...] tecosystems » Rational Wrapup: Two Days in Orlando Redmonker Steve&#8217;s reports on RDSC&#8217;07 (tags: IBM Rational) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tecosystems » Rational Wrapup: Two Days in Orlando Redmonker Steve&#8217;s reports on RDSC&#8217;07 (tags: IBM Rational) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; Does IBM need a new software brand for the grassroots? And Big Blue&#8217;s Source code backlash</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/comment-page-1/#comment-106509</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; Does IBM need a new software brand for the grassroots? And Big Blue&#8217;s Source code backlash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/#comment-106509</guid>
		<description>[...] Just wondering. If the target audience is developers, rather than people that manage the people that manage developers, the majority have little if any interest in Governing Software And Systems Delivery. They just want productive tools. Stephen says:  &#8220;Rational is evolving in two distinct directions simultaneously.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just wondering. If the target audience is developers, rather than people that manage the people that manage developers, the majority have little if any interest in Governing Software And Systems Delivery. They just want productive tools. Stephen says:  &#8220;Rational is evolving in two distinct directions simultaneously.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens E</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/comment-page-1/#comment-106278</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 03:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/06/17/rsdc_2007/#comment-106278</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t know you were around as we exhibited. We missed you - would have loved to grab a drink or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t know you were around as we exhibited. We missed you &#8211; would have loved to grab a drink or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 322/324 objects using xcache

Served from: redmonk.com @ 2012-02-12 12:17:44 -->
