Comments on: Microsoft’s Patent Play: The Q&A http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/ because technology is just another ecosystem Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:19:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: tecosystems » Microsoft, the GPL and Linux: The Q&A http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/comment-page-1/#comment-556871 tecosystems » Microsoft, the GPL and Linux: The Q&A Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:59:32 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/#comment-556871 [...] efforts from certain Microsoft constituencies to reach out to open source communities, there have continued to be significant divisions between Microsoft and open source advocates, and more critically, within [...] [...] efforts from certain Microsoft constituencies to reach out to open source communities, there have continued to be significant divisions between Microsoft and open source advocates, and more critically, within [...]

]]> By: tecosystems » MSFT vs TomTom: The Q&A http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/comment-page-1/#comment-522382 tecosystems » MSFT vs TomTom: The Q&A Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:46:50 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/#comment-522382 [...] - actively and aggressively pursue software patents. More specifically, in this case, Microsoft has in the past stated that its belief is that certain open source assets - including the Linux kernel employed by [...] [...] – actively and aggressively pursue software patents. More specifically, in this case, Microsoft has in the past stated that its belief is that certain open source assets – including the Linux kernel employed by [...]

]]> By: 451 CAOS Theory » 451 CAOS Links - 2007.05.14 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/comment-page-1/#comment-384623 451 CAOS Theory » 451 CAOS Links - 2007.05.14 Wed, 14 May 2008 21:55:49 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/#comment-384623 [...] Microsoft’s Patent Play: The Q&A, RedMonk - tecosystems, Stephen O’Grady (Blog) [...] [...] Microsoft’s Patent Play: The Q&A, RedMonk – tecosystems, Stephen O’Grady (Blog) [...]

]]> By: tecosystems » More Ozzie, Less Ballmer - Please http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/comment-page-1/#comment-333643 tecosystems » More Ozzie, Less Ballmer - Please Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:21:45 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/#comment-333643 [...] he’s damning Apple with faint praise, threatening open source, or denigrating former employees, I’ve long argued that Microsoft’s Steve Ballmer [...] [...] he’s damning Apple with faint praise, threatening open source, or denigrating former employees, I’ve long argued that Microsoft’s Steve Ballmer [...]

]]> By: M$ - Linux Patent Headlines In The Past Few Days « alll about linux http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/comment-page-1/#comment-133664 M$ - Linux Patent Headlines In The Past Few Days « alll about linux Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:00:05 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/#comment-133664 [...] Microsoft’s Patent Play: The Q&A [...] [...] Microsoft’s Patent Play: The Q&A [...]

]]> By: tecosystems » Discussing Patents: Two Approaches http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/comment-page-1/#comment-94930 tecosystems » Discussing Patents: Two Approaches Wed, 30 May 2007 17:42:38 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/#comment-94930 [...] the wake of Microsoft’s deplorable patent commentary, I’ve had the opportunity to speak with a couple of vendors on the subject of software [...] [...] the wake of Microsoft’s deplorable patent commentary, I’ve had the opportunity to speak with a couple of vendors on the subject of software [...]

]]> By: tecosystems » Survived the NXT Event http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/comment-page-1/#comment-88189 tecosystems » Survived the NXT Event Mon, 21 May 2007 22:03:20 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/#comment-88189 [...] had perfect answers - there’s too much internal inconsistency positioning-wise for that (and my position remains unchanged) - but that he took all questions and answered them as honestly and [...] [...] had perfect answers – there’s too much internal inconsistency positioning-wise for that (and my position remains unchanged) – but that he took all questions and answered them as honestly and [...]

]]> By: People Over Process » Blog Archive » Microsoft’s Patent Impasse http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/comment-page-1/#comment-86434 People Over Process » Blog Archive » Microsoft’s Patent Impasse Sat, 19 May 2007 21:14:46 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/#comment-86434 [...] moment and about 10-15 years of distrust from “the free world” and their friends. See Steve’s comments along these lines for more. In this case too, the patent nukes could launch as [...] [...] moment and about 10-15 years of distrust from “the free world” and their friends. See Steve’s comments along these lines for more. In this case too, the patent nukes could launch as [...]

]]> By: Luis Villa http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/comment-page-1/#comment-86182 Luis Villa Sat, 19 May 2007 12:26:20 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/#comment-86182 <i>Couldn’t have said it better myself, which is probably why I’m not a Supreme Court Judge.</i> Kennedy is... not the most clear of Supreme Court judges. In fact, I dare say several of his decisions would be better off being written in patented O'Grady Q&A format ;) And actually, historically, there have been quite a few Supreme Court judges who were not lawyers. None since shortly before WWII, though, if I remember right. Couldn’t have said it better myself, which is probably why I’m not a Supreme Court Judge.

Kennedy is… not the most clear of Supreme Court judges. In fact, I dare say several of his decisions would be better off being written in patented O’Grady Q&A format ;)

And actually, historically, there have been quite a few Supreme Court judges who were not lawyers. None since shortly before WWII, though, if I remember right.

]]> By: MS Windows and Office violate 532 patents? « A stag’s weblog http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/comment-page-1/#comment-85998 MS Windows and Office violate 532 patents? « A stag’s weblog Sat, 19 May 2007 07:47:01 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/05/14/microsoft_patent_play/#comment-85998 [...] Microsoft’s Patent Play: The Q&A [...] [...] Microsoft’s Patent Play: The Q&A [...]

]]>