<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-03-14</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/03/13/links-for-2007-03-14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/03/13/links-for-2007-03-14/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Atwood</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/03/13/links-for-2007-03-14/#comment-53865</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Atwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 00:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/03/13/links-for-2007-03-14/#comment-53865</guid>
		<description>I'm the author/presenter for the mysql s3 storage engine.  I've just made my first public release of it, it's at http://fallenpegasus.com/code/mysql-awss3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m the author/presenter for the mysql s3 storage engine.  I&#8217;ve just made my first public release of it, it&#8217;s at <a href="http://fallenpegasus.com/code/mysql-awss3" >http://fallenpegasus.com/code/mysql-awss3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Herren</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/03/13/links-for-2007-03-14/#comment-33406</link>
		<dc:creator>John Herren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/03/13/links-for-2007-03-14/#comment-33406</guid>
		<description>The idea of s3/ec2 for all my hosting needs is so appealing, but non-persistent mysql instances just won't cut it. There's a couple interesting ways to replicate around the problem, such as running two mysqls on one instance, but they're far from efficient. Latency is the deal breaker for using db's off-site from ec2 frontends, so the idea of a storage engine is pretty exciting. Better yet, I'd like to see Amazon give us an object-relational database or something similar to Google Base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of s3/ec2 for all my hosting needs is so appealing, but non-persistent mysql instances just won&#8217;t cut it. There&#8217;s a couple interesting ways to replicate around the problem, such as running two mysqls on one instance, but they&#8217;re far from efficient. Latency is the deal breaker for using db&#8217;s off-site from ec2 frontends, so the idea of a storage engine is pretty exciting. Better yet, I&#8217;d like to see Amazon give us an object-relational database or something similar to Google Base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Comay</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/03/13/links-for-2007-03-14/#comment-33397</link>
		<dc:creator>David Comay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/03/13/links-for-2007-03-14/#comment-33397</guid>
		<description>Stephen, I'm troubled to hear about the installation failure of the Solaris Express Developer Edition.  Will you blog with some additional details or drop me a line?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, I&#8217;m troubled to hear about the installation failure of the Solaris Express Developer Edition.  Will you blog with some additional details or drop me a line?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
