Comments on: links for 2007-02-28 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/02/27/links-for-2007-02-28/ because technology is just another ecosystem Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:56:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: sogrady http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/02/27/links-for-2007-02-28/comment-page-1/#comment-25605 sogrady Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:44:44 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/02/27/links-for-2007-02-28/#comment-25605 Luis: thanks for checking in. i'll probably wait a month or two, then make the jump. i love the bleeding edge ;) re: Dargo, i agree. it's not that he doesn't have a point, and he clearly acknowledges the marketplace success and demand for MySQL style offerings, i'm just not - given that - why the definition of a database is worth debating. Luis: thanks for checking in. i’ll probably wait a month or two, then make the jump. i love the bleeding edge ;)

re: Dargo, i agree. it’s not that he doesn’t have a point, and he clearly acknowledges the marketplace success and demand for MySQL style offerings, i’m just not – given that – why the definition of a database is worth debating.

]]> By: Luis Villa http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/02/27/links-for-2007-02-28/comment-page-1/#comment-25291 Luis Villa Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:37:31 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/02/27/links-for-2007-02-28/#comment-25291 Re: Feisty, I've been running it on my multimedia box for a while, and all looks good there, but I admit I haven't upgraded on my primary work box. "restricting their definition [of DBs] to those that handle recovery" Boy, move him up to #1 on the list of people who dabble is going to blindside. :) Re: Feisty, I’ve been running it on my multimedia box for a while, and all looks good there, but I admit I haven’t upgraded on my primary work box.

“restricting their definition [of DBs] to those that handle recovery”

Boy, move him up to #1 on the list of people who dabble is going to blindside. :)

]]>