<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-01-02</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/01/01/links-for-2007-01-02/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/01/01/links-for-2007-01-02/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sogrady</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/01/01/links-for-2007-01-02/comment-page-1/#comment-8171</link>
		<dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 08:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/01/01/links-for-2007-01-02/#comment-8171</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the comment I posted over at Ted&#039;s blog (which I think is being moderated):

The del.icio.us text size being fairly delimited, I didn&#039;t have &lt;i&gt;quite&lt;/i&gt; the space I needed to flesh out the &quot;Biggest Community Wins&quot; argument alluded to in my link. The comment, in fact, was merely a reference to an earlier post &lt;a href=&quot;http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/11/17/biggest-community-wins/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; describing our own move from Movable Type to WordPress.

In short, though, there&#039;s not much I disagree with above. Size is not the only metric for success (particularly for niche or non-platform technologies), it&#039;s dependent on a variety of other factors as noted, and it&#039;s not everything. 

That said, I think if one looks at the history of the software industry, it indicates that community size is the single most accurate gauge for success. Think Windows, Linux, or the phenomenon known as WordPress. Communities are built and sustained through different paths or different means, but in the end size does matter. A lot. 

It may not guarantee longevity, and it certainly doesn&#039;t indicate technical excellence, but it does encourage adoption. Which in the end, as VHS taught us, is probably what really matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the comment I posted over at Ted&#8217;s blog (which I think is being moderated):</p>
<p>The del.icio.us text size being fairly delimited, I didn&#8217;t have <i>quite</i> the space I needed to flesh out the &#8220;Biggest Community Wins&#8221; argument alluded to in my link. The comment, in fact, was merely a reference to an earlier post <a href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/11/17/biggest-community-wins/">here</a> describing our own move from Movable Type to WordPress.</p>
<p>In short, though, there&#8217;s not much I disagree with above. Size is not the only metric for success (particularly for niche or non-platform technologies), it&#8217;s dependent on a variety of other factors as noted, and it&#8217;s not everything. </p>
<p>That said, I think if one looks at the history of the software industry, it indicates that community size is the single most accurate gauge for success. Think Windows, Linux, or the phenomenon known as WordPress. Communities are built and sustained through different paths or different means, but in the end size does matter. A lot. </p>
<p>It may not guarantee longevity, and it certainly doesn&#8217;t indicate technical excellence, but it does encourage adoption. Which in the end, as VHS taught us, is probably what really matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Leung on the Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Size isn&#8217;t everything</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/01/01/links-for-2007-01-02/comment-page-1/#comment-8135</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Leung on the Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Size isn&#8217;t everything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2007/01/01/links-for-2007-01-02/#comment-8135</guid>
		<description>[...] Stephen O&#8217;Grady del.icio.us&#8217;ed the inaugural post of the new blog, and his comment was &#8220;biggest community wins&#8221;. It&#8217;s true that the size of a community matters, but it&#8217;s not as simple as absolute size. Communities need to reach a point where they become resilient and self sustaining. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stephen O&#8217;Grady del.icio.us&#8217;ed the inaugural post of the new blog, and his comment was &#8220;biggest community wins&#8221;. It&#8217;s true that the size of a community matters, but it&#8217;s not as simple as absolute size. Communities need to reach a point where they become resilient and self sustaining. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 237/239 objects using xcache

Served from: redmonk.com @ 2012-02-13 17:47:24 -->
