<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2006-09-02</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/09/01/links-for-2006-09-02/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/09/01/links-for-2006-09-02/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: stephen o'grady</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/09/01/links-for-2006-09-02/#comment-2312</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen o'grady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=1030#comment-2312</guid>
		<description>Luis: i understand and certainly sympathize. nor would i be unappreciative of that feature myself. but the question remains - apart from you or i - would it be useful to have a music purchase and acquisition service rolled tied into Linux generally, or GNOME specifically? 

i think the answer depends on what your goals are. if the goal is indeed to compete, at least on some basis, with Apple and Microsoft i think the answer is probably yes. 

if you accept that, the question then becomes: what's your best option? from where i'm sitting, it's clearly emusic, because it's the only one not applying DRM. i'd hope that some of the unfortunate subscription decisions - which may, in fact, be necessary for them to be a viable business - don't obscure that. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luis: i understand and certainly sympathize. nor would i be unappreciative of that feature myself. but the question remains - apart from you or i - would it be useful to have a music purchase and acquisition service rolled tied into Linux generally, or GNOME specifically? </p>
<p>i think the answer depends on what your goals are. if the goal is indeed to compete, at least on some basis, with Apple and Microsoft i think the answer is probably yes. </p>
<p>if you accept that, the question then becomes: what&#8217;s your best option? from where i&#8217;m sitting, it&#8217;s clearly emusic, because it&#8217;s the only one not applying DRM. i&#8217;d hope that some of the unfortunate subscription decisions - which may, in fact, be necessary for them to be a viable business - don&#8217;t obscure that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/09/01/links-for-2006-09-02/#comment-2311</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=1030#comment-2311</guid>
		<description>I and at least one other gnome dev (Bastien Nocera) unsubbed from emusic because of their non-rollover subscription policy. If they fixed that, people would probably be a lot more likely to work with it.   That said, see: http://projects.matt-good.net/trac/emusic-gnome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I and at least one other gnome dev (Bastien Nocera) unsubbed from emusic because of their non-rollover subscription policy. If they fixed that, people would probably be a lot more likely to work with it.   That said, see: <a href="http://projects.matt-good.net/trac/emusic-gnome" >http://projects.matt-good.net/trac/emusic-gnome</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
