Comments on: RSDC: Forget What I Said Before, Jazz is the News http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/06/07/rsdc-forget-what-i-said-before-jazz-is-the-news/ because technology is just another ecosystem Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:19:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Bill Higgins http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/06/07/rsdc-forget-what-i-said-before-jazz-is-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-112661 Bill Higgins Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:07:24 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=889#comment-112661 FYI Steve, re: "you have to see the demo to believe it", anyone can now see demos online at Jazz.net: http://jazz.net/pub/learn/videos/videos.jsp FYI Steve, re: “you have to see the demo to believe it”, anyone can now see demos online at Jazz.net:

http://jazz.net/pub/learn/videos/videos.jsp

]]> By: Bill Higgins http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/06/07/rsdc-forget-what-i-said-before-jazz-is-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-2046 Bill Higgins Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:04:38 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=889#comment-2046 Steve wrote: > It was another implication of the Jazz project that had a lot of people at the > show talking, however; their intention to develop Jazz under what they term an > "Open Commercial Software development" methodology. This is not to be confused > with open source, because they have no intention of allowing for external > contributions and the like, but is rather traditional software development > conducted in transparent fashion. There are a few quotes from Lee and Martin on my blog that clarify Jazz open source bits vs. open commercial development bits (sorry for blogjacking but the quote formatting looks better on my blog than in a comment here!) http://www-03.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/BillHiggins?entry=big_jazz_news Steve wrote:
> It was another implication of the Jazz project that had a lot of people at the
> show talking, however; their intention to develop Jazz under what they term an
> “Open Commercial Software development” methodology. This is not to be confused
> with open source, because they have no intention of allowing for external
> contributions and the like, but is rather traditional software development
> conducted in transparent fashion.

There are a few quotes from Lee and Martin on my blog that clarify Jazz open source bits vs. open commercial development bits (sorry for blogjacking but the quote formatting looks better on my blog than in a comment here!)

http://www-03.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/BillHiggins?entry=big_jazz_news

]]>