<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pretty is a Feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/03/06/pretty-is-a-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/03/06/pretty-is-a-feature/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: stephen o'grady</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/03/06/pretty-is-a-feature/#comment-1707</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen o'grady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=752#comment-1707</guid>
		<description>Alex: 90% or otherwise, it's much easier on my eyes, anyway

Danno: i can't speak from experience, not having used it much, but at least when i operate within the context of the terminal window colors on black has been much less strain inducing. 

Fraxas: amen, sir, amen. make things easy and attractive, and you're off to a good start. 

Edward: i suspect you're right - Cote, for one, is an emacs user with a unique color scheme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex: 90% or otherwise, it&#8217;s much easier on my eyes, anyway</p>
<p>Danno: i can&#8217;t speak from experience, not having used it much, but at least when i operate within the context of the terminal window colors on black has been much less strain inducing. </p>
<p>Fraxas: amen, sir, amen. make things easy and attractive, and you&#8217;re off to a good start. </p>
<p>Edward: i suspect you&#8217;re right - Cote, for one, is an emacs user with a unique color scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/03/06/pretty-is-a-feature/#comment-1708</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=752#comment-1708</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Whole Bunch of Little Stuff&lt;/strong&gt;

Today's proved to be an exciting day so far: I caught with an old friend from the Mesa/FX days, John Arley Burns. It turns out he's had a lot of experience in his current job testing out open source systems...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Whole Bunch of Little Stuff</strong></p>
<p>Today&#8217;s proved to be an exciting day so far: I caught with an old friend from the Mesa/FX days, John Arley Burns. It turns out he&#8217;s had a lot of experience in his current job testing out open source systems&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/03/06/pretty-is-a-feature/#comment-1706</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward O'Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=752#comment-1706</guid>
		<description>I think this helps to explain the popularity of color-theme.el for Emacs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this helps to explain the popularity of color-theme.el for Emacs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fraxas</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/03/06/pretty-is-a-feature/#comment-1705</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraxas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 16:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=752#comment-1705</guid>
		<description>Pretty is a feature for people.  Pretty is a feature for developers because developers are people.  I risk coming off as a UI zealot by saying this, but too much time is spent on feature development and not enough on UI development.  

The very few applications out there that Actually Get that features are useless unless they are findable and usable are the immensely popular ones, and the rest of us developers still haven't cottoned on to that.  The same is true for standards: HTML took off because HTML parsers are incredibly tolerant of error.  WS-* is dying the death because it's insufficiently discoverable and its tools are not tolerant of error.  Java's ubiquitous, meaningful stack traces are *one of the languages most important features*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty is a feature for people.  Pretty is a feature for developers because developers are people.  I risk coming off as a UI zealot by saying this, but too much time is spent on feature development and not enough on UI development.  </p>
<p>The very few applications out there that Actually Get that features are useless unless they are findable and usable are the immensely popular ones, and the rest of us developers still haven&#8217;t cottoned on to that.  The same is true for standards: HTML took off because HTML parsers are incredibly tolerant of error.  WS-* is dying the death because it&#8217;s insufficiently discoverable and its tools are not tolerant of error.  Java&#8217;s ubiquitous, meaningful stack traces are *one of the languages most important features*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/03/06/pretty-is-a-feature/#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 15:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=752#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>My "black" is actually about 90%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My &#8220;black&#8221; is actually about 90%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danno</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/03/06/pretty-is-a-feature/#comment-1703</link>
		<dc:creator>Danno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=752#comment-1703</guid>
		<description>White on black is actually harder to read than black on white after a few minutes.

You should change the black to a slightly dark gray.  That really reduces eye-strain.

Alternatively, try changing your white background to a slightly yellowish color or a light grey, so it looks more like it's paper instead of some unholy white field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White on black is actually harder to read than black on white after a few minutes.</p>
<p>You should change the black to a slightly dark gray.  That really reduces eye-strain.</p>
<p>Alternatively, try changing your white background to a slightly yellowish color or a light grey, so it looks more like it&#8217;s paper instead of some unholy white field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/03/06/pretty-is-a-feature/#comment-1702</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 07:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=752#comment-1702</guid>
		<description>For clarification, the main reason I use a dark background is to reduce eye strain.

I have configured BBEdit to use the same basic color scheme, but where TextMate beats the pants off BBEdit is (as you noted) with the theme switching capabilities.

The most obvious practical application of this is when using my laptop outside. In the sunlight, it's easier to see dark text on a light background than vice versa - and TextMate's themes let me switch between these choices easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For clarification, the main reason I use a dark background is to reduce eye strain.</p>
<p>I have configured BBEdit to use the same basic color scheme, but where TextMate beats the pants off BBEdit is (as you noted) with the theme switching capabilities.</p>
<p>The most obvious practical application of this is when using my laptop outside. In the sunlight, it&#8217;s easier to see dark text on a light background than vice versa - and TextMate&#8217;s themes let me switch between these choices easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
