Comments on: IBM Getting Mono? http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/01/27/ibm-getting-mono/ because technology is just another ecosystem Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:21:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: stephen o'grady http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/01/27/ibm-getting-mono/#comment-1540 stephen o'grady Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:39:57 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=711#comment-1540 excellent point, Erik. and to the best of my knowledge - and i'd be shocked if this was wrong - IBM has never contributed to Mono. but the underlying truth is that they're benefitting b/c of the Mono work, so while they might not 'get it' consciously, the technical folks know and understand the deal i think. excellent point, Erik. and to the best of my knowledge - and i’d be shocked if this was wrong - IBM has never contributed to Mono.

but the underlying truth is that they’re benefitting b/c of the Mono work, so while they might not ‘get it’ consciously, the technical folks know and understand the deal i think.

]]> By: Erik Dasque http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2006/01/27/ibm-getting-mono/#comment-1539 Erik Dasque Sat, 28 Jan 2006 23:58:05 +0000 http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=711#comment-1539 IBM getting Mono ? No. IBM is conveniently ignoring the fact that their migration program is Mono based and keeping that fact pretty much silent. This is a proprietary approach from two commercial companies and while Mainsoft has once upon a time contributed to Mono, IBM never as AFAIK. IBM getting Mono ?

No. IBM is conveniently ignoring the fact that their migration program is Mono based and keeping that fact pretty much silent. This is a proprietary approach from two commercial companies and while Mainsoft has once upon a time contributed to Mono, IBM never as AFAIK.

]]>