<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avalon / Indigo / Mono Q&#38;A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/06/22/avalon-indigo-mono-qa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/06/22/avalon-indigo-mono-qa/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Governor's MonkChips</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/06/22/avalon-indigo-mono-qa/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor's MonkChips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=482#comment-812</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why Microsoft Office XML could be a boon for MONO&lt;/strong&gt;

If Microsoft wants to use ECMA standardisation as an argument for openstandardness (like open handedness, geddit), then it may have to cut the chilling effects that have so far held back Mono in production environments.&#160;The idea is put forward in...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why Microsoft Office XML could be a boon for MONO</strong></p>
<p>If Microsoft wants to use ECMA standardisation as an argument for openstandardness (like open handedness, geddit), then it may have to cut the chilling effects that have so far held back Mono in production environments.&nbsp;The idea is put forward in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
