<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SubText: Simplicity Squared?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/05/27/subtext-simplicity-squared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/05/27/subtext-simplicity-squared/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/05/27/subtext-simplicity-squared/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=447#comment-706</guid>
		<description>On the "larger group of contributors" point, see also what Dynamic Aspects (http://www.dynamicaspects.com/) are doing with their domain/object system, which is very similar to the approach of subtext.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the &#8220;larger group of contributors&#8221; point, see also what Dynamic Aspects (http://www.dynamicaspects.com/) are doing with their domain/object system, which is very similar to the approach of subtext.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
