<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Predictions: Languages, Databases, and Collaboration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/05/13/three-predictions-languages-databases-and-collaboration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/05/13/three-predictions-languages-databases-and-collaboration/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sogrady</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/05/13/three-predictions-languages-databases-and-collaboration/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 01:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=429#comment-685</guid>
		<description>hi Andy, sorry for the delayed response. this got buried as an older post. but anyhow, the article you point to i think is a great example of the non-relational store. Sleepycat's got a great reputation amongst discerning technologists as fast, scalable, etc. but it still is perceived as a niche or non-mainstream play. i think what we'll see in the months ahead is a recognition that non-mainstream players like Sleepycat or Thunderstone might have a place in next generation distributed architectures. time will tell, of course, but if the conversations i have are anything to go by that's what i think we'll see. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Andy, sorry for the delayed response. this got buried as an older post. but anyhow, the article you point to i think is a great example of the non-relational store. Sleepycat&#8217;s got a great reputation amongst discerning technologists as fast, scalable, etc. but it still is perceived as a niche or non-mainstream play. i think what we&#8217;ll see in the months ahead is a recognition that non-mainstream players like Sleepycat or Thunderstone might have a place in next generation distributed architectures. time will tell, of course, but if the conversations i have are anything to go by that&#8217;s what i think we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/05/13/three-predictions-languages-databases-and-collaboration/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 00:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=429#comment-684</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I think I asked for this in a comment earlier today... http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&#38;pa=showpage&#38;pid=299</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I think I asked for this in a comment earlier today&#8230; <a href="http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&amp;pa=showpage&amp;pid=299" >http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&amp;pa=showpage&amp;pid=299</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/05/13/three-predictions-languages-databases-and-collaboration/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 19:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=429#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I'm trailing your old feeds here, do you have a deeper analysis of enterprise class non-relational stores?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I&#8217;m trailing your old feeds here, do you have a deeper analysis of enterprise class non-relational stores?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
