<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trimming my Bloglines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/04/11/trimming-my-bloglines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/04/11/trimming-my-bloglines/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sogrady</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/04/11/trimming-my-bloglines/comment-page-1/#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 15:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=395#comment-613</guid>
		<description>well Richard, i think it largely depends on a couple of things:

1. how many people are on the blogroll
2. what your relationship is with the owner of the blogroll (i.e. is it someone you respect enough to find new sources through?)

in the case of #1, with someone like me who lists everyone, i agree. the value of the blogroll is minimal. for people that selectively and explicitly publish a small blogroll, however, i think, or know actually, that it does make a big difference.

in the case of #2, i think generally you're correct that people don't notice. but i have on more than a few occasions paged through someone i respect's blogroll and found a couple of new sources. 

so really it's a mixed bag. sometimes it matters, often it doesn't. but when it does matter, i think, it really matters. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well Richard, i think it largely depends on a couple of things:</p>
<p>1. how many people are on the blogroll<br />
2. what your relationship is with the owner of the blogroll (i.e. is it someone you respect enough to find new sources through?)</p>
<p>in the case of #1, with someone like me who lists everyone, i agree. the value of the blogroll is minimal. for people that selectively and explicitly publish a small blogroll, however, i think, or know actually, that it does make a big difference.</p>
<p>in the case of #2, i think generally you&#8217;re correct that people don&#8217;t notice. but i have on more than a few occasions paged through someone i respect&#8217;s blogroll and found a couple of new sources. </p>
<p>so really it&#8217;s a mixed bag. sometimes it matters, often it doesn&#8217;t. but when it does matter, i think, it really matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Veryard</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/04/11/trimming-my-bloglines/comment-page-1/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Veryard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=395#comment-612</guid>
		<description>Does anyone take any notice of blogrolls? I often discover new blogs when I follow a discussion back from a blog I'm already subscribed to, and sometimes I subscribe to them as well. But I ignore blogrolls because they just look like meaningless lists of cryptic names.

And I can't see any point in publishing my blogroll either. I have lots of blogs I subscribe to, for various reasons. Some of them are good and insightful, and some of them are just there so I can get alerted to events. It's not particularly secret - if anyone wants to nose around Bloglines they can easily find my subscription list - but it doesn't mean anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone take any notice of blogrolls? I often discover new blogs when I follow a discussion back from a blog I&#8217;m already subscribed to, and sometimes I subscribe to them as well. But I ignore blogrolls because they just look like meaningless lists of cryptic names.</p>
<p>And I can&#8217;t see any point in publishing my blogroll either. I have lots of blogs I subscribe to, for various reasons. Some of them are good and insightful, and some of them are just there so I can get alerted to events. It&#8217;s not particularly secret - if anyone wants to nose around Bloglines they can easily find my subscription list - but it doesn&#8217;t mean anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/04/11/trimming-my-bloglines/comment-page-1/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=395#comment-611</guid>
		<description>i hope thats the blogroll *before* you cut down....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope thats the blogroll *before* you cut down&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sogrady</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/04/11/trimming-my-bloglines/comment-page-1/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=395#comment-610</guid>
		<description>no, Steve G. got his link. the Jon Udell citation is to his blog. 

but, yes, bad news on the trackback but that's spam for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, Steve G. got his link. the Jon Udell citation is to his blog. </p>
<p>but, yes, bad news on the trackback but that&#8217;s spam for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/04/11/trimming-my-bloglines/comment-page-1/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=395#comment-609</guid>
		<description>excellent. Steven doesn't like links so you don't give him one. super. it will have to be technorati then.

REALLY bad news on pinging, though of course the spam is killing us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent. Steven doesn&#8217;t like links so you don&#8217;t give him one. super. it will have to be technorati then.</p>
<p>REALLY bad news on pinging, though of course the spam is killing us</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
