<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would Blogging be Fun if You Had to Blog?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/03/09/would-blogging-be-fun-if-you-had-to-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/03/09/would-blogging-be-fun-if-you-had-to-blog/</link>
	<description>because technology is just another ecosystem</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Grisanzio</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2005/03/09/would-blogging-be-fun-if-you-had-to-blog/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Grisanzio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redmonk.com/sogrady/wp/?p=350#comment-502</guid>
		<description>Would blogging be fun if we *had* to blog? Perhaps. As long as we could keep our voice. However, if we had to deliver a marketing message, I'd dump the activity immediately. Most of us would. It's really that simple. What marketing types don't understand is that messages *result* from actions, not the other way around. That's why BSC is successful: it's optional and it's personal. It's not a corporate mandate.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would blogging be fun if we *had* to blog? Perhaps. As long as we could keep our voice. However, if we had to deliver a marketing message, I&#8217;d dump the activity immediately. Most of us would. It&#8217;s really that simple. What marketing types don&#8217;t understand is that messages *result* from actions, not the other way around. That&#8217;s why BSC is successful: it&#8217;s optional and it&#8217;s personal. It&#8217;s not a corporate mandate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
