<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links for December 1st</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redmonk.com/cote/2009/12/01/links-for-december-1st-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redmonk.com/cote/2009/12/01/links-for-december-1st-2/</link>
	<description>One foot in the muck, the other in utopia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 14:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cote</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/cote/2009/12/01/links-for-december-1st-2/#comment-3209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cote]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/?p=3576#comment-3209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yup, I&#039;d agree with that. With it being in HTML 5 and (seemingly) tested out by Google here and there where its supported, it doesn&#039;t seem too bad. More importantly, it does signal even more what Google has been saying recently: it&#039;s all about the HMTL 5. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, I&#039;d agree with that. With it being in HTML 5 and (seemingly) tested out by Google here and there where its supported, it doesn&#039;t seem too bad. More importantly, it does signal even more what Google has been saying recently: it&#039;s all about the HMTL 5. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Passell</title>
		<link>http://redmonk.com/cote/2009/12/01/links-for-december-1st-2/#comment-3208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Passell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmonk.com/cote/?p=3576#comment-3208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you think about the Google Gears news?  In a sense, I&#039;ve always thought of Gears as a way to bridge the gap between older browsers to HTML 5, so the announcement didn&#039;t really shock me.  Given that there are frameworks such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dojotoolkit.org/offline&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dojo Offline&lt;/a&gt; that already provide an abstraction layer on top of Gears functionality (using HTML 5 rather than Gears when it&#039;s available), I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessarily that big a deal.

--Matt ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think about the Google Gears news?  In a sense, I&#039;ve always thought of Gears as a way to bridge the gap between older browsers to HTML 5, so the announcement didn&#039;t really shock me.  Given that there are frameworks such as <a href="http://www.dojotoolkit.org/offline" rel="nofollow">Dojo Offline</a> that already provide an abstraction layer on top of Gears functionality (using HTML 5 rather than Gears when it&#039;s available), I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessarily that big a deal.</p>
<p>&#8211;Matt </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
